AMD EPYC 8324PN vs HiSilicon Kirin 925

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 8324PN CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 925
AMD EPYC 8324PN HiSilicon Kirin 925

CPU comparison

AMD EPYC 8324PN or HiSilicon Kirin 925 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD EPYC 8324PN has 32 cores with 64 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 8324PN was released in Q3/2023.

The HiSilicon Kirin 925 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 925 was released in Q3/2014.
AMD EPYC (129) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
AMD EPYC 8004/9004 (15) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 920 (3)
4 Generation 2
Bergamo/Siena (Zen 4c) Architecture Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 8324PN is a 32 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.05 GHz (3.00 GHz). The HiSilicon Kirin 925 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.80 GHz.

AMD EPYC 8324PN Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 925
32 Cores 8
64 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.05 GHz (3.00 GHz)
32x Zen 4c
A-Core 1.80 GHz
4x Cortex-A15
-- B-Core 1.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A7

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AMD EPYC 8324PN Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 925
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T628 MP4
GPU frequency 0.60 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.60 GHz
-- GPU Generation Midgard 2
Technology 32nm
Max. displays 1
-- Compute units 4
-- Shader 64
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory --
-- DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-T628 MP4
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The AMD EPYC 8324PN supports a maximum of GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 925 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels.

AMD EPYC 8324PN Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 925
DDR5-4800 Memory LPDDR3-1600
Max. Memory
6 (Hexa Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
230.4 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
128.00 MB L3 Cache --
5.0 PCIe version --
96 PCIe lanes --
378.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD EPYC 8324PN has a TDP of 130 W, that of the HiSilicon Kirin 925 is --.

AMD EPYC 8324PN Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 925
130 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 8324PN has a 128.00 MB cache, while the HiSilicon Kirin 925 cache has a total of 0.00 MB.

AMD EPYC 8324PN Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 925
5 nm Technology 28 nm
Chiplet Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv7-A (32 bit)
SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI ISA extensions --
SP6 Socket --
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 Operating systems Android
Q3/2023 Release date Q3/2014
2125 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 8324PN to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 925 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD EPYC 8324PN AMD EPYC 8324PN
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 925 HiSilicon Kirin 925
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 @ 0.60 GHz
77 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD EPYC 8324PN HiSilicon Kirin 925
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 212HiSilicon Kirin 925 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 210HiSilicon Kirin 925 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
3. HiSilicon Kirin 925AMD FX-8310 HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs AMD FX-8310
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 845HiSilicon Kirin 925 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 710HiSilicon Kirin 925 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
6. HiSilicon Kirin 925AMD FX-4300 HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs AMD FX-4300
7. Apple A14 BionicHiSilicon Kirin 925 Apple A14 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
8. Intel Core i5-4570HiSilicon Kirin 925 Intel Core i5-4570 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
9. HiSilicon Kirin 925Intel Core i3-3220 HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs Intel Core i3-3220
10. HiSilicon Kirin 925Intel Core i5-9400H HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs Intel Core i5-9400H


back to index