AMD EPYC 7502 vs Intel Celeron N2808

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 7502 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Celeron N2808
AMD EPYC 7502 Intel Celeron N2808

CPU comparison

AMD EPYC 7502 or Intel Celeron N2808 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD EPYC 7502 has 32 cores with 64 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.35 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7502 was released in Q3/2019.

The Intel Celeron N2808 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.25 GHz. The CPU supports up to 4 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The Intel Celeron N2808 was released in Q2/2014.
AMD EPYC (129) Family Intel Celeron (165)
AMD EPYC 7002 (24) CPU group Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 (17)
2 Generation 6
Rome (Zen 2) Architecture Bay Trail
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
AMD EPYC 7501 Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 7502 has 32 CPU cores and can calculate 64 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7502 is 2.50 GHz (3.35 GHz) while the Intel Celeron N2808 has 2 CPU cores and 2 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron N2808 is at 1.58 GHz (2.25 GHz).
AMD EPYC 7502 Characteristic Intel Celeron N2808
32 Cores 2
64 Threads 2
normal Core architecture normal
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.50 GHz Frequency 1.58 GHz
3.35 GHz Turbo Frequency (1 Core) 2.25 GHz
3.00 GHz Turbo Frequency (All Cores) 2.25 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
AMD EPYC 7502 Characteristic Intel Celeron N2808
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The AMD EPYC 7502 or Intel Celeron N2808 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
no iGPU GPU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
GPU frequency 0.31 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 0.79 GHz
-- GPU Generation 7
Technology 22 nm
Max. displays 2
-- Compute units 4
-- Shader 32
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
-- DirectX Version 11.2

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU GPU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
No Codec JPEG Decode

Memory & PCIe

The AMD EPYC 7502 can use up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s. The Intel Celeron N2808 supports up to 4 GB of memory in 1 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 10.7 GB/s.
AMD EPYC 7502 Characteristic Intel Celeron N2808
DDR4-3200 Memory DDR3-1333
Max. Memory 4 GB
8 (Octa Channel) Memory channels 1 (Single Channel)
51.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 10.7 GB/s
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
128.00 MB L3 Cache 1.00 MB
4.0 PCIe version 2.0
128 PCIe lanes 4
252.0 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth 2.0 GB/s

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 7502 is 180 W, while the Intel Celeron N2808 has a TDP of 4.5 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.
AMD EPYC 7502 Characteristic Intel Celeron N2808
180 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 4.5 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down 3 W
-- Tjunction max. 100 °C

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 7502 is manufactured in 7 nm and has 128.00 MB cache. The Intel Celeron N2808 is manufactured in 22 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache.
AMD EPYC 7502 Characteristic Intel Celeron N2808
7 nm Technology 22 nm
Chiplet Chip design Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2
SP3 Socket BGA 1170
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2019 Release date Q2/2014
4250 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 7502 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Celeron N2808 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7502 (100%)
Intel Celeron N2808 (18%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7502 (100%)
Intel Celeron N2808 (2%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7502 AMD EPYC 7502
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz
1074 (100%)
Intel Celeron N2808 Intel Celeron N2808
2C 2T @ 2.25 GHz
223 (21%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 7502 AMD EPYC 7502
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz
26746 (100%)
Intel Celeron N2808 Intel Celeron N2808
2C 2T @ 2.25 GHz
415 (2%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD EPYC 7502 AMD EPYC 7502
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz
1283 (100%)
Intel Celeron N2808 Intel Celeron N2808
2C 2T @ 2.25 GHz
181 (14%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD EPYC 7502 AMD EPYC 7502
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz
12796 (100%)
Intel Celeron N2808 Intel Celeron N2808
2C 2T @ 2.25 GHz
311 (2%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD EPYC 7502 AMD EPYC 7502
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz
49180 (100%)
Intel Celeron N2808 Intel Celeron N2808
2C 2T @ 2.25 GHz
520 (1%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7502 AMD EPYC 7502
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz
391 (100%)
Intel Celeron N2808 Intel Celeron N2808
2C 2T @ 2.25 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD EPYC 7502 AMD EPYC 7502
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron N2808 Intel Celeron N2808
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.79 GHz
51 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 7502 AMD EPYC 7502
32C 64T @ 3.35 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron N2808 Intel Celeron N2808
2C 2T @ 2.25 GHz
36 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 7502 AMD EPYC 7502
32C 64T @ 3.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Celeron N2808 Intel Celeron N2808
2C 2T @ 2.25 GHz
70 (100%)

Devices using this processor
AMD EPYC 7502 Intel Celeron N2808
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Celeron N2808Intel Atom Z3735F Intel Celeron N2808 vs Intel Atom Z3735F
2. Intel Celeron J1900Intel Celeron N2808 Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Celeron N2808
3. Intel Celeron N2808Intel Celeron N2807 Intel Celeron N2808 vs Intel Celeron N2807
4. Intel Celeron N2808Intel Celeron N3050 Intel Celeron N2808 vs Intel Celeron N3050
5. Intel Celeron N2808Intel Celeron N2830 Intel Celeron N2808 vs Intel Celeron N2830
6. AMD EPYC 7452AMD EPYC 7502 AMD EPYC 7452 vs AMD EPYC 7502
7. AMD Athlon 5350Intel Celeron N2808 AMD Athlon 5350 vs Intel Celeron N2808
8. Intel Celeron N2808Intel Celeron 2955U Intel Celeron N2808 vs Intel Celeron 2955U
9. Intel Celeron N2808Intel Core i3-4360T Intel Celeron N2808 vs Intel Core i3-4360T
10. AMD EPYC 7502AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X AMD EPYC 7502 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X


back to index