Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD EPYC 7352 vs Intel Core i5-14400
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD EPYC 7352
47 %
24C / 48T · 3.20 GHz
Intel Core i5-14400
100 %
10C / 16T · 4.70 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD EPYC 7352
100 %
24C / 48T · 2.70 GHz
Intel Core i5-14400
82 %
10C / 16T · 2.50 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2026 (ST)
218 entries
218 entries
Cinebench 2026 (MC)
219 entries
219 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7352 | Intel Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD EPYC (147) | Intel Core i5 (336) |
| CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (25) | Intel Core i 14000 (34) |
| Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) | Raptor Lake S Refresh |
| Technology | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Server | Desktop |
| Socket | SP3 | LGA 1700 |
| Predecessor | Intel Core i5-13400 | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7352 | Intel Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 10 / 16 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 24x 2.30 - 3.20 GHz |
6x Raptor Cove 2.50 - 4.70 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Gracemont 1.80 - 3.50 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 9.50 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 128.00 MB | 20.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7352 | Intel Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 - 1.55 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 24 / 192 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7352 | Intel Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7352 | Intel Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) | DDR5-5600 (89.6 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 192 GB | |
| Memory channels | 8 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 128 | 5.0 x 20 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s | 78.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7352 | Intel Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 155 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 148 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD EPYC 7352 | Intel Core i5-14400 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ |
| Release date | Q3/2019 | Q1/2024 |
| Release price | 2750 $ | 221 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD EPYC 7352 is 0 stars (0 ratings), while Intel Core i5-14400 has received 4.0 stars (99 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
Intel Core i5-14400
10C / 16T · 4.70 GHz
9
AMD EPYC 7352
24C / 48T · 3.20 GHz
Popular Comparisons
