AMD Athlon II X4 645 vs AMD EPYC 9474F

Last updated: 2024-04-12

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD Athlon II X4 645		AMD EPYC 9474F
CPU comparison AMD Athlon II X4 645 or AMD EPYC 9474F - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The AMD Athlon II X4 645 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.10 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Athlon II X4 645 was released in Q3/2010. The AMD EPYC 9474F has 48 cores with 96 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.10 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9474F was released in Q4/2022.

AMD Athlon II (52)	Family	AMD EPYC (129)
AMD Athlon II X4 (Propus) (10)	CPU group	AMD EPYC 9004 (21)
1	Generation	4
Propus	Architecture	Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4)
Desktop / Server	Segment	Desktop / Server
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	AMD EPYC 9475F

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The AMD Athlon II X4 645 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.10 GHz. The AMD EPYC 9474F has 48 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.60 GHz (4.10 GHz).
AMD Athlon II X4 645	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 9474F
4	Cores	48
4	Threads	96
normal	Core architecture	normal
No	Hyperthreading	Yes
No	Overclocking ?	No
3.10 GHz	Frequency	3.60 GHz
--	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	4.10 GHz
--	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	3.95 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
AMD Athlon II X4 645	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 9474F
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
	GPU frequency	--
--	GPU (Turbo)	--
--	GPU Generation	--
	Technology
	Max. displays
--	Compute units	--
--	Shader	--
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
--	Max. GPU Memory	--
--	DirectX Version	--

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
No	Codec h264	No
No	Codec VP9	No
No	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
No	Codec AVC	No
No	Codec VC-1	No
No	Codec JPEG	No

Memory & PCIe The AMD Athlon II X4 645 supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9474F can connect up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels.
AMD Athlon II X4 645	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 9474F
DDR3-1333	Memory	DDR5-4800
16 GB	Max. Memory	6144 GB
2 (Dual Channel)	Memory channels	12
21.3 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	460.8 GB/s
No	ECC	Yes
2.00 MB	L2 Cache	48.00 MB
--	L3 Cache	256.00 MB
2.0	PCIe version	5.0
--	PCIe lanes	128
--	PCIe Bandwidth	504.1 GB/s
Thermal Management The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD Athlon II X4 645 has a TDP of 95 W, that of the AMD EPYC 9474F is 360 W.
AMD Athlon II X4 645	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 9474F
95 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	360 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	400 W
--	TDP down	320 W
--	Tjunction max.	100 °C
Technical details The AMD Athlon II X4 645 has a 2.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 9474F cache has a total of 304.00 MB.
AMD Athlon II X4 645	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 9474F
45 nm	Technology	5 nm
Unknown	Chip design	Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
MMX, 3DNow!, SSE3, SSE4a	ISA extensions	SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
AM3	Socket	SP5
AMD-V	Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM
No	AES-NI	Yes
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems	Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11
Q3/2010	Release date	Q4/2022
--	Release price	6780 $

show more data		show more data

AMD Athlon II X4 645 4C 4T @ 3.10 GHz buy now on Amazon and save! AMD EPYC 9474F 48C 96T @ 3.60 GHz (4.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Athlon II X4 645 4C 4T @ 3.10 GHz	402 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 9474F 48C 96T @ 4.10 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Athlon II X4 645 4C 4T @ 3.10 GHz	1520 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 9474F 48C 96T @ 3.95 GHz	0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Athlon II X4 645 4C 4T @ 3.10 GHz	399 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 9474F 48C 96T @ 4.10 GHz	0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Athlon II X4 645 4C 4T @ 3.10 GHz	1374 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 9474F 48C 96T @ 3.95 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD Athlon II X4 645 4C 4T @ 3.10 GHz	157 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 9474F 48C 96T @ 4.10 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Athlon II X4 645 4C 4T @ 3.10 GHz	601 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 9474F 48C 96T @ 3.95 GHz	0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	AMD Athlon II X4 645 4C 4T @ 3.10 GHz	2274 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 9474F 48C 96T @ 3.95 GHz	0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	AMD Athlon II X4 645 4C 4T @ 3.10 GHz	575 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 9474F 48C 96T @ 3.60 GHz	0 (0%)

Devices using this processor
AMD Athlon II X4 645	AMD EPYC 9474F
Unknown	Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs


1.		AMD Phenom II X4 955 vs AMD Athlon II X4 645
2.		AMD EPYC 9474F vs AMD EPYC 9554
3.		AMD Athlon II X4 645 vs Intel Core i5-1240P
4.		AMD Athlon II X4 645 vs Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
5.		AMD Athlon II X4 645 vs AMD Athlon II X4 860K
6.		AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9474F
7.		AMD EPYC 9474F vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
8.		Intel Core i5-680 vs AMD Athlon II X4 645
9.		AMD Athlon 3000G vs AMD Athlon II X4 645
10.		AMD Athlon II X4 645 vs AMD FX-8350