Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD A9-9420 vs Intel Processor U300
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD A9-9420
39 %
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Intel Processor U300
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 13th Gen (48 EU)
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9420 | Intel Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A (112) | Intel Processor U (7) |
| CPU group | AMD A9-9000 (4) | Intel Core i 1300P/1300U (33) |
| Architecture | Stoney Ridge (Excavator) | Raptor Lake U |
| Technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | FP4 | BGA 1744 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9420 | Intel Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 5 / 6 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x 3.00 - 3.60 GHz |
1x Raptor Cove 1.20 - 4.40 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Gracemont 0.90 - 3.30 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | 10.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9420 | Intel Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | Intel UHD Graphics 13th Gen (48 EU) |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | 0.20 - 1.10 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 3 / 192 | 48 / 384 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 32 GB |
| Technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2016 | Q1/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9420 | Intel Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9420 | Intel Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2133 (17.1 GB/s) | LPDDR5-5200 (83.2 GB/s) DDR5-5200 (83.2 GB/s) LPDDR4X-4266 (68.2 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 96 GB |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 8 | 4.0 x 20 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 7.9 GB/s | 39.4 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9420 | Intel Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | 15 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 55 W | |
| TDP up | 25 W | |
| TDP down | 10 W | 12 W |
| T. junction max. | 90 °C | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9420 | Intel Processor U300 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q2/2017 | Q1/2023 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD A9-9420 is 3.7 stars (14 ratings), while Intel Processor U300 has received 3.9 stars (30 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Intel Processor U300
5C / 6T · 4.40 GHz
9
AMD A9-9420
2C / 2T · 3.60 GHz
Popular Comparisons
