AMD A4-6250 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD A4-6250 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 | |
CPU comparisonAMD A4-6250 or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD A4-6250 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD A4-6250 was released in . The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 was released in Q3/2017. |
||
| AMD A (112) | Family | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO (28) |
| Unknown M (4) | CPU group | AMD Ryzen 1000 (15) |
| 0 | Generation | 1 |
| Unknown | Architecture | Summit Ridge (Zen) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD A4-6250 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz). |
||
| AMD A4-6250 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 2.00 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.60 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.40 GHz |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| Unknown | GPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | -- | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| Technology | ||
| 0 | Max. displays | |
| -- | Compute units | -- |
| -- | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Unknown | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD A4-6250 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 can connect up to 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| AMD A4-6250 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| DDR3-1600 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 25.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 2.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 19.7 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD A4-6250 has a TDP of 25 W, that of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is 95 W. |
||
| AMD A4-6250 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| 25 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 95 °C |
Technical detailsThe AMD A4-6250 has a 2.00 MB cache, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 cache has a total of 16.00 MB. |
||
| AMD A4-6250 | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| Unknown | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| BGA 769 | Socket | AM4 (PGA 1331) |
| Unknown | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Release date | Q3/2017 | |
| -- | Release price | 300 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
6C 12T @ 3.20 GHz (3.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
6C 12T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD A4-6250 | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
