AMD A4-6250 vs AMD EPYC 7282
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD A4-6250 | AMD EPYC 7282 | |
CPU comparisonAMD A4-6250 or AMD EPYC 7282 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD A4-6250 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD A4-6250 was released in . The AMD EPYC 7282 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7282 was released in Q3/2019. |
||
| AMD A (112) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Unknown M (4) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 0 | Generation | 2 |
| Unknown | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD A4-6250 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz. The AMD EPYC 7282 has 16 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz (3.20 GHz). |
||
| AMD A4-6250 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7282 |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.00 GHz | Frequency | 2.80 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.20 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.00 GHz |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| Unknown | GPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | -- | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| Technology | ||
| 0 | Max. displays | |
| -- | Compute units | -- |
| -- | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Unknown | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD A4-6250 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7282 can connect up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. |
||
| AMD A4-6250 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7282 |
| DDR3-1600 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 25.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 2.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 64.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD A4-6250 has a TDP of 25 W, that of the AMD EPYC 7282 is 120 W. |
||
| AMD A4-6250 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7282 |
| 25 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 120 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD A4-6250 has a 2.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 7282 cache has a total of 64.00 MB. |
||
| AMD A4-6250 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7282 |
| Technology | 7 nm | |
| Unknown | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| Unknown | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| BGA 769 | Socket | SP3 |
| Unknown | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Release date | Q3/2019 | |
| -- | Release price | 1200 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
16C 32T @ 2.80 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7282
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7282
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7282
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD A4-6250
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7282
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD A4-6250 | AMD EPYC 7282 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
