AMD A10-9700 vs Samsung Exynos 7884
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD A10-9700 | Samsung Exynos 7884 | |
CPU comparisonAMD A10-9700 or Samsung Exynos 7884 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD A10-9700 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. Up to 64 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD A10-9700 was released in Q3/2017. The Samsung Exynos 7884 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7884 was released in Q2/2018. |
||
| AMD A (112) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| AMD A10-9700 (1) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 7872/7884/7885/7904 (4) |
| 7 | Generation | 2 |
| Excavator (Bristol Ridge) | Architecture | Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD A10-9700 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.50 GHz (3.80 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 7884 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 1.60 GHz. |
||
| AMD A10-9700 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7884 |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.50 GHz (3.80 GHz) 4x Excavator |
A-Core | 1.60 GHz 2x Cortex-A73 |
| -- | B-Core | 1.35 GHz 6x Cortex-A53 |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| AMD Radeon R7 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) | GPU | ARM Mali-G71 MP2 |
| 1.03 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.77 GHz |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 6 | GPU Generation | Bifrost 1 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 1 |
| 6 | Compute units | 2 |
| 384 | Shader | 32 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| AMD Radeon R7 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) | GPU | ARM Mali-G71 MP2 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode |
| Decode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD A10-9700 supports a maximum of 64 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 7884 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. |
||
| AMD A10-9700 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7884 |
| DDR4-2400 | Memory | LPDDR4-1866 |
| 64 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 38.4 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| 2.00 MB | L2 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 8 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 7.9 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD A10-9700 has a TDP of 65 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 7884 is --. |
||
| AMD A10-9700 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7884 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| 45 W | TDP down | -- |
| 90 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD A10-9700 has a 2.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 7884 cache has a total of 2.00 MB. |
||
| AMD A10-9700 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 7884 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4 | ISA extensions | -- |
| AM4 (PGA 1331) | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2017 | Release date | Q2/2018 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz (3.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD A10-9700
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD A10-9700
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD A10-9700
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
AMD A10-9700
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD A10-9700
AMD Radeon R7 - 384 (Bristol Ridge) @ 1.03 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
ARM Mali-G71 MP2 @ 0.77 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD A10-9700
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD A10-9700
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD A10-9700
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD A10-9700
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD A10-9700
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
AMD A10-9700
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD A10-9700
4C 4T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD A10-9700
4C 4T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7884
8C 8T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD A10-9700 | Samsung Exynos 7884 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
