Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD A10-7800 vs AMD A4-5300
Last updated:
Summary
The AMD A10-7800 (Kaveri, Steamroller), introduced in 2014, targeted mainstream desktops for daily tasks and light gaming.
The AMD A4-5300 (Kabini, Jaguar) for simple entry-level systems, suitable for basic applications.
Both AMD processors are manufactured using the 28 nm process. The AMD A10-7800 has 4 CPU cores, 4 MB L3 cache, PCIe 3.0, and 30 GB/s memory bandwidth. Its Steamroller architecture delivers significantly higher single-core performance and outperforms the AMD A4-5300, which has 2 CPU cores, 1 MB L3 cache, and 26 GB/s memory bandwidth, in multi-core tasks.
For gaming, the AMD A10-7800 clearly has the advantage. Its AMD Radeon R7 - 512 graphics unit significantly surpasses the AMD Radeon HD 7480D of the AMD A4-5300, supported by higher memory bandwidth. Specific TDP values are missing, but the AMD A10-7800 will consume more power due to higher performance.
Both are not available new; a price-performance evaluation without current used market prices is difficult. However, the AMD A10-7800 offers significantly more performance. The AMD A10-7800 offers superior CPU and graphics performance for general tasks and light gaming. The AMD A4-5300 is suitable for basic applications.
For most requirements, the AMD A10-7800 is the better choice.
The AMD A4-5300 (Kabini, Jaguar) for simple entry-level systems, suitable for basic applications.
Both AMD processors are manufactured using the 28 nm process. The AMD A10-7800 has 4 CPU cores, 4 MB L3 cache, PCIe 3.0, and 30 GB/s memory bandwidth. Its Steamroller architecture delivers significantly higher single-core performance and outperforms the AMD A4-5300, which has 2 CPU cores, 1 MB L3 cache, and 26 GB/s memory bandwidth, in multi-core tasks.
For gaming, the AMD A10-7800 clearly has the advantage. Its AMD Radeon R7 - 512 graphics unit significantly surpasses the AMD Radeon HD 7480D of the AMD A4-5300, supported by higher memory bandwidth. Specific TDP values are missing, but the AMD A10-7800 will consume more power due to higher performance.
Both are not available new; a price-performance evaluation without current used market prices is difficult. However, the AMD A10-7800 offers significantly more performance. The AMD A10-7800 offers superior CPU and graphics performance for general tasks and light gaming. The AMD A4-5300 is suitable for basic applications.
For most requirements, the AMD A10-7800 is the better choice.
AMD A10-7800
- Stronger CPU performance
- Superior integrated graphics
- Higher memory bandwidth
- PCIe 3.0 support
AMD A4-5300
- Suitable for basic applications
- Integrated graphics for basic tasks
- More compact architecture
- Lower expected power consumption
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD A10-7800
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.90 GHz
AMD A4-5300
90 %
2C / 2T · 3.60 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD A10-7800
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
AMD A4-5300
47 %
2C / 2T · 3.60 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
AMD A10-7800
100 %
AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Kaveri)
AMD A4-5300
26 %
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
More benchmarks
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A10-7800 | AMD A4-5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A (112) | AMD A (112) |
| CPU group | AMD A10-7000 (7) | AMD A4-5000 (5) |
| Architecture | Kaveri (Steamroller) | Kabini (Jaguar) |
| Technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | FM2+ | FM2 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD A10-7800 | AMD A4-5300 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 3.50 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.90 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.70 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 1.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD A10-7800 | AMD A4-5300 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Kaveri) | AMD Radeon HD 7480D |
| GPU frequency | 0.72 GHz | 0.72 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 8 / 512 | 2 / 128 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Release date | Q1/2014 | Q2/2012 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A10-7800 | AMD A4-5300 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD A10-7800 | AMD A4-5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | ||
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD A10-7800 | AMD A4-5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD A10-7800 | AMD A4-5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | ||
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| Release date | Q1/2014 | Q3/2012 |
| Release price | 38 $ | |
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD A10-7800 is 4.1 stars (21 ratings), while AMD A4-5300 has received 3.0 stars (4 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
AMD A10-7800
4C / 4T · 3.90 GHz
9
AMD A4-5300
2C / 2T · 3.60 GHz
Popular Comparisons
