Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung Exynos 9610 | Intel Xeon Gold 6314U | |
CPU comparisonSamsung Exynos 9610 or Intel Xeon Gold 6314U - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Samsung Exynos 9610 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9610 was released in Q4/2018. The Intel Xeon Gold 6314U has 32 cores with 64 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Gold 6314U was released in Q2/2021. |
||
| Samsung Exynos (47) | Family | Intel Xeon Gold (163) |
| Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) | CPU group | Intel Xeon Gold 5300/6300 (21) |
| 3 | Generation | 3 |
| Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Ice Lake |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 9610 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz. The Intel Xeon Gold 6314U has 32 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz (3.40 GHz). |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9610 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Gold 6314U |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.30 GHz 4x Cortex-A73 |
A-Core | 2.30 GHz (3.40 GHz) |
| 1.70 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.85 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Bifrost 2 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 16 nm | Technology | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| 3 | Compute units | -- |
| 48 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 12 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | GPU | no iGPU |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Samsung Exynos 9610 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Gold 6314U can connect up to 6144 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9610 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Gold 6314U |
| LPDDR4X-1600 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. Memory | 6144 GB | |
| 0 | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 48.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 64 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 126.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 9610 has a TDP of --, that of the Intel Xeon Gold 6314U is 205 W. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9610 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Gold 6314U |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 205 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 9610 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the Intel Xeon Gold 6314U cache has a total of 48.00 MB. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 9610 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon Gold 6314U |
| 10 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| -- | Socket | LGA 4189 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q4/2018 | Release date | Q2/2021 |
| -- | Release price | 2600 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
32C 64T @ 2.30 GHz (3.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
32C 64T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
32C 64T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
32C 64T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
32C 64T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
32C 64T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9610
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
32C 64T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung Exynos 9610 | Intel Xeon Gold 6314U |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
