Share link|

Submit benchmark

Comparison Search Benchmarks CPUs Leaderboards CPU News & Articles GPU comparison Apple product comparison

Deutsch English Español Français Italiano Japanese

Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Intel Processor N200

Last updated: 2026-06-07

Table of Contents

Summary
Benchmarks
Specifications
User Reviews
Popular Comparisons

Summary

Benchmarks

Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks

Single-core performance

Rank 2 - 32 %

Samsung Exynos 9610

Rank 1 - 100 %

Intel Processor N200

Multi-core performance

Rank 2 - 43 %

Samsung Exynos 9610

Rank 1 - 100 %

Intel Processor N200

Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance

8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz

370

4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz

1,288

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz

1,095

4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz

3,504

Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance

8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz

329

4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz

958

Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz

1,164

4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz

2,128

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)

384

More benchmarks

Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries

Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries

Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries

Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries

Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries

Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries

Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries

Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries

FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries

3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries

PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries

Specifications

At a glance

Wischen	Samsung Exynos 9610	Intel Processor N200
Family	Samsung Exynos (49)	Intel Processor N (9)
CPU group	Samsung Exynos 9600 (3)	Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5)
Architecture	Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53	Alder Lake N
Technology	10 nm	10 nm
Segment	Smartphone / Tablet	Notebook
Socket		BGA
Predecessor
Successor

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Wischen	Samsung Exynos 9610	Intel Processor N200
CPU Cores / Threads	8 / 8	4 / 4
Hyperthreading / SMT	✗	✗
Core architecture	hybrid (big.LITTLE)	normal
Core Cluster 1:	4x Cortex-A73 2.30 GHz	4x Gracemont 1.80 - 3.70 GHz
Core Cluster 2:	4x Cortex-A53 1.70 GHz
L2-Cache		4.00 MB
L3-Cache		6.00 MB
Overclocking	✗	✗

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Wischen	Samsung Exynos 9610	Intel Processor N200
GPU name	ARM Mali-G72 MP3	Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)
GPU frequency	0.85 GHz	0.40 - 0.75 GHz
CUs / Shader	3 / 48	32 / 256
Raytracing	✗	✗
Max. displays	1	3
Max. GPU Memory	2 GB	8 GB
Technology	16 nm	10 nm
Release date	Q3/2017	Q1/2023

NPU AI performance

Wischen	Samsung Exynos 9610	Intel Processor N200
AI hardware
AI specifications
NPU + CPU + iGPU

Memory & PCIe

Wischen	Samsung Exynos 9610	Intel Processor N200
Memory	LPDDR4X-1600	LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s)
Max. Memory		16 GB
Memory channels	0	1
ECC	No	No
PCIe		3.0 x 9
PCIe Bandwidth		8.9 GB/s

Thermal Management

Wischen	Samsung Exynos 9610	Intel Processor N200
TDP		6 W
TDP (PL2)
TDP up
TDP down
T. junction max.		105 °C

Technical details

Wischen	Samsung Exynos 9610	Intel Processor N200
Chip design	Unknown	Monolithic
AES-NI	✗	✓
Operating systems	Android	Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Instruction set	Armv8-A (64 bit)	x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions		SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2
Release date	Q4/2018	Q1/2023
Release price		193 $
Documents	Technical data sheet	Technical data sheet

User Reviews

Your rating

Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Samsung Exynos 9610 is 2.0 stars (2 ratings), while Intel Processor N200 has received 3.4 stars (105 ratings).

Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.

Samsung Exynos 9610
8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz

★★★★★

Intel Processor N200
4C / 4T · 1.80 - 3.70 GHz

★★★★★