Samsung Exynos 9610 vs AMD EPYC 9124

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 9610 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD EPYC 9124
Samsung Exynos 9610 AMD EPYC 9124

CPU comparison

Samsung Exynos 9610 or AMD EPYC 9124 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Samsung Exynos 9610 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9610 was released in Q4/2018.

The AMD EPYC 9124 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9124 was released in Q4/2022.
Samsung Exynos (47) Family AMD EPYC (129)
Samsung Exynos 9600 (3) CPU group AMD EPYC 9004 (21)
3 Generation 4
Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53 Architecture Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 9610 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz. The AMD EPYC 9124 has 16 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.00 GHz (3.70 GHz).

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic AMD EPYC 9124
8 Cores 16
8 Threads 32
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
A-Core 3.00 GHz (3.70 GHz)
16x Zen 4
1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53
B-Core --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic AMD EPYC 9124
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU no iGPU
0.85 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Bifrost 2 GPU Generation --
16 nm Technology
1 Max. displays
3 Compute units --
48 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
2 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The Samsung Exynos 9610 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9124 can connect up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic AMD EPYC 9124
LPDDR4X-1600 Memory DDR5-4800
Max. Memory 6144 GB
0 Memory channels 12
-- Max. Bandwidth 460.8 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache 16.00 MB
-- L3 Cache 64.00 MB
-- PCIe version 5.0
-- PCIe lanes 128
-- PCIe Bandwidth 504.1 GB/s

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 9610 has a TDP of --, that of the AMD EPYC 9124 is 200 W.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic AMD EPYC 9124
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 200 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up 240 W
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. 100 °C

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 9610 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 9124 cache has a total of 80.00 MB.

Samsung Exynos 9610 Characteristic AMD EPYC 9124
10 nm Technology 5 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
-- Socket SP5
None Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11
Q4/2018 Release date Q4/2022
-- Release price 1083 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9610 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 1.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 9124 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
329 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9124 AMD EPYC 9124
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1164 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9124 AMD EPYC 9124
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
370 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9124 AMD EPYC 9124
16C 32T @ 3.70 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1095 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9124 AMD EPYC 9124
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz
94 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9124 AMD EPYC 9124
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
171465 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9124 AMD EPYC 9124
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
2235 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9124 AMD EPYC 9124
16C 32T @ 3.60 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 9610 AMD EPYC 9124
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Samsung Exynos 9610Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
2. Samsung Exynos 9610Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Samsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
4. Samsung Exynos 1380Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GSamsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 9610
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Samsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
7. AMD EPYC 9124AMD EPYC 7313 AMD EPYC 9124 vs AMD EPYC 7313
8. Apple A14 BionicSamsung Exynos 9610 Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9610
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730Samsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
10. Samsung Exynos 9610Apple A13 Bionic Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Apple A13 Bionic


back to index