Samsung Exynos 9610 vs AMD Athlon II X4 605e Benchmark, comparison and differences


Samsung Exynos 9610		AMD Athlon II X4 605e
CPU comparison Samsung Exynos 9610 or AMD Athlon II X4 605e - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The Samsung Exynos 9610 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 9610 was released in Q4/2018. The AMD Athlon II X4 605e has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Athlon II X4 605e was released in Q3/2009.

Samsung Exynos (47)	Family	AMD Athlon II (52)
Samsung Exynos 9600 (3)	CPU group	AMD Athlon II X4 (Propus) (10)
3	Generation	1
Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53	Architecture	Propus
Mobile	Segment	Desktop / Server
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The Samsung Exynos 9610 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz. The AMD Athlon II X4 605e has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.30 GHz.
Samsung Exynos 9610	Characteristic	AMD Athlon II X4 605e
8	Cores	4
8	Threads	4
hybrid (big.LITTLE)	Core architecture	normal
No	Hyperthreading	No
No	Overclocking ?	No
2.30 GHz 4x Cortex-A73	A-Core	2.30 GHz
1.70 GHz 4x Cortex-A53	B-Core	--
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
Samsung Exynos 9610	Characteristic	AMD Athlon II X4 605e
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
ARM Mali-G72 MP3	GPU	no iGPU
0.85 GHz	GPU frequency	--
--	GPU (Turbo)	--
Bifrost 2	GPU Generation	--
16 nm	Technology
1	Max. displays
3	Compute units	--
48	Shader	--
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
2 GB	Max. GPU Memory	--
12	DirectX Version	--

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
ARM Mali-G72 MP3	GPU	no iGPU
Decode / Encode	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
Decode / Encode	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
Decode / Encode	Codec h264	No
Decode / Encode	Codec VP9	No
Decode / Encode	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
Decode / Encode	Codec AVC	No
Decode / Encode	Codec VC-1	No
Decode / Encode	Codec JPEG	No

Memory & PCIe The Samsung Exynos 9610 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The AMD Athlon II X4 605e can connect up to 16 GB of memory in 2 memory channels.
Samsung Exynos 9610	Characteristic	AMD Athlon II X4 605e
LPDDR4X-1600	Memory	DDR3-1333
	Max. Memory	16 GB
0	Memory channels	2 (Dual Channel)
--	Max. Bandwidth	21.3 GB/s
No	ECC	No
--	L2 Cache	2.00 MB
--	L3 Cache	--
--	PCIe version	2.0
--	PCIe lanes	--
--	PCIe Bandwidth	--
Thermal Management The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 9610 has a TDP of --, that of the AMD Athlon II X4 605e is 45 W.
Samsung Exynos 9610	Characteristic	AMD Athlon II X4 605e
--	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	45 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	--
--	Tjunction max.	--
Technical details The Samsung Exynos 9610 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the AMD Athlon II X4 605e cache has a total of 2.00 MB.
Samsung Exynos 9610	Characteristic	AMD Athlon II X4 605e
10 nm	Technology	45 nm
Unknown	Chip design	Unknown
Armv8-A (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
--	ISA extensions	MMX, 3DNow!, SSE3, SSE4a
--	Socket	AM3
None	Virtualization	AMD-V
No	AES-NI	No
Android	Operating systems	Windows 10, Linux
Q4/2018	Release date	Q3/2009
--	Release price	--

show more data		show more data

Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save! AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks

Samsung Exynos 9610 (100%)

AMD Athlon II X4 605e (93%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks

Samsung Exynos 9610 (100%)

AMD Athlon II X4 605e (90%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	329 (100%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz	305 (93%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	1164 (100%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz	1069 (92%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	2235 (100%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz	1960 (88%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz	301 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz	1140 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	370 (100%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	1095 (100%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz	120 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz	457 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz	94 (100%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e @ 0.00 GHz	0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	171465 (100%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz	55 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 9610 8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD Athlon II X4 605e 4C 4T @ 2.30 GHz	213 (100%)


1.		Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
2.		Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
3.		Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
4.		Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
5.		Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 9610
6.		Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
7.		Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9610
8.		Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
9.		Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Apple A13 Bionic
10.		Samsung Exynos 9610 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710

Samsung Exynos 9610 vs AMD Athlon II X4 605e

CPU comparison with benchmarks

CPU comparison

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Internal Graphics

Hardware codec support

Memory & PCIe

Thermal Management

Technical details