Samsung Exynos 5433 vs Intel Xeon W-3245
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Samsung Exynos 5433 | Intel Xeon W-3245 | |
CPU comparisonSamsung Exynos 5433 or Intel Xeon W-3245 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Samsung Exynos 5433 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.90 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 5433 was released in Q3/2014. The Intel Xeon W-3245 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3245 was released in Q2/2019. |
||
| Samsung Exynos (47) | Family | Intel Xeon W (83) |
| Samsung Exynos 5433 (1) | CPU group | Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 (17) |
| 1 | Generation | 7 |
| Cortex-A57 / Cortex-A53 | Architecture | Cascade Lake W |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | Intel Xeon W-3345 |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Samsung Exynos 5433 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 5433 is 1.90 GHz while the Intel Xeon W-3245 has 16 CPU cores and 32 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-3245 is at 3.20 GHz (4.60 GHz). |
||
| Samsung Exynos 5433 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3245 |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.90 GHz 4x Cortex-A57 |
A-Core | 3.20 GHz (4.60 GHz) |
| 1.30 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
B-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe Samsung Exynos 5433 or Intel Xeon W-3245 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| ARM Mali-T760 MP6 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.70 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.70 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Midgard 3 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 28nm | Technology | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| 6 | Compute units | -- |
| 96 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T760 MP6 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Samsung Exynos 5433 can use up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Xeon W-3245 supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 140.7 GB/s. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 5433 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3245 |
| LPDDR3e-1066 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
| Max. Memory | 1024 GB | |
| 0 | Memory channels | 6 (Hexa Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 140.7 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 2.25 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 22.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 64 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 63.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Samsung Exynos 5433 is --, while the Intel Xeon W-3245 has a TDP of 205 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 5433 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3245 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 205 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Samsung Exynos 5433 is manufactured in 20 nm and has 2.25 MB cache. The Intel Xeon W-3245 is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 22.00 MB cache. |
||
| Samsung Exynos 5433 | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3245 |
| 20 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Unknown | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv8-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| -- | Socket | LGA 3647 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2014 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| -- | Release price | 1990 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz (4.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5433
ARM Mali-T760 MP6 @ 0.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3245
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Samsung Exynos 5433
8C 8T @ 1.90 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3245
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Samsung Exynos 5433 | Intel Xeon W-3245 |
| Unknown | Apple Mac Pro (2019) |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
