Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Samsung Exynos 5250 vs Intel Processor N200
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
ARM Mali-T604 MP4
Intel Processor N200
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 5250 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Samsung Exynos (49) | Intel Processor N (9) |
| CPU group | Samsung Exynos 5250 (1) | Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A15 | Alder Lake N |
| Technology | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 5250 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x Cortex-A15 | 4x Gracemont |
| Frequency: | 1.70 GHz | 1.80 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.70 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.40 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 1.00 MB | 4.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 6.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 5250 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-T604 MP4 | Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.53 - 0.53 GHz | 0.40 - 0.75 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 64 | 32 / 256 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 32nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2012 | Q1/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 5250 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 5250 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR3-800 | LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| Memory channels | 0 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 9 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 5250 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 5250 | Intel Processor N200 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Android | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | Armv7-A (32 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q4/2011 | Q1/2023 |
| Release price | 193 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Samsung Exynos 5250 is 5.0 stars (2 ratings), while Intel Processor N200 has received 3.4 stars (106 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Samsung Exynos 5250
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
9
Intel Processor N200
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Popular Comparisons
