Samsung Exynos 3475 vs AMD A4-3400

Last updated: 2024-02-07

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 3475		AMD A4-3400
CPU comparison Samsung Exynos 3475 or AMD A4-3400 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The Samsung Exynos 3475 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 3475 was released in 2015. The AMD A4-3400 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD A4-3400 was released in Q3/2011.

Samsung Exynos (46)	Family	AMD A (112)
Samsung Exynos 3400 (2)	CPU group	AMD A4-3000 (3)
3	Generation	1
Cortex-A7	Architecture	Llano (K10)
Mobile	Segment	Desktop / Server
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The Samsung Exynos 3475 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.30 GHz. The AMD A4-3400 has 2 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.70 GHz.
Samsung Exynos 3475	Characteristic	AMD A4-3400
4	Cores	2
4	Threads	2
normal	Core architecture	normal
No	Hyperthreading	No
No	Overclocking ?	Yes
1.30 GHz	Frequency	2.70 GHz
--	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	--
--	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	--

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
Samsung Exynos 3475	Characteristic	AMD A4-3400
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.
ARM Mali-T720 MP1	GPU	AMD Radeon HD 6410D
0.60 GHz	GPU frequency	0.60 GHz
0.60 GHz	GPU (Turbo)	--
Midgard 3	GPU Generation	3
28nm	Technology	32 nm
2	Max. displays	2
1	Compute units	2
16	Shader	160
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
--	Max. GPU Memory	1 GB
11	DirectX Version	11

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
ARM Mali-T720 MP1	GPU	AMD Radeon HD 6410D
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
Decode / Encode	Codec h264	Decode
No	Codec VP9	No
Decode / Encode	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
No	Codec AVC	Decode
No	Codec VC-1	Decode
No	Codec JPEG	Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe The Samsung Exynos 3475 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The AMD A4-3400 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels.
Samsung Exynos 3475	Characteristic	AMD A4-3400
LPDDR3-400	Memory	DDR3-1600
	Max. Memory
0	Memory channels	2 (Dual Channel)
--	Max. Bandwidth	25.6 GB/s
No	ECC	No
--	L2 Cache	1.00 MB
--	L3 Cache	--
--	PCIe version	--
--	PCIe lanes	--
--	PCIe Bandwidth	--
Thermal Management The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Samsung Exynos 3475 has a TDP of --, that of the AMD A4-3400 is 65 W.
Samsung Exynos 3475	Characteristic	AMD A4-3400
--	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	65 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	--
--	Tjunction max.	--
Technical details The Samsung Exynos 3475 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the AMD A4-3400 cache has a total of 1.00 MB.
Samsung Exynos 3475	Characteristic	AMD A4-3400
28 nm	Technology	32 nm
Unknown	Chip design	Unknown
Armv7-A (32 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
--	ISA extensions	SSE3, SSE4a
--	Socket	FM1
None	Virtualization	AMD-V
No	AES-NI	No
Android	Operating systems	Windows 10, Linux
2015	Release date	Q3/2011
--	Release price	28 $

show more data		show more data

Samsung Exynos 3475 4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save! AMD A4-3400 2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.


	Samsung Exynos 3475 ARM Mali-T720 MP1 @ 0.60 GHz	10 (5%)
	AMD A4-3400 AMD Radeon HD 6410D @ 0.60 GHz	192 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 3475 4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD A4-3400 2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz	349 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 3475 4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD A4-3400 2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz	643 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 3475 4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD A4-3400 2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz	125 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 3475 4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD A4-3400 2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz	245 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	Samsung Exynos 3475 4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD A4-3400 2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz	1082 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	Samsung Exynos 3475 4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD A4-3400 2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz	243 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Samsung Exynos 3475 4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD A4-3400 2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz	66 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Samsung Exynos 3475 4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD A4-3400 2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz	125 (100%)

Devices using this processor
Samsung Exynos 3475	AMD A4-3400
Unknown	Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs


1.		AMD Athlon 3000G vs AMD A4-3400
2.		AMD A4-3400 vs Intel Core i5-5200U
3.		AMD A4-5000 vs AMD A4-3400
4.		AMD FX-4350 vs AMD A4-3400
5.		AMD Athlon II X4 740 vs AMD A4-3400
6.		Intel Core i5-4590 vs AMD A4-3400
7.		Intel Celeron G1820 vs AMD A4-3400
8.		AMD FX-7600P vs AMD A4-3400
9.		AMD A4-3400 vs AMD FX-9590
10.		Intel Core i7-4770K vs AMD A4-3400