Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Apple M5
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
8C / 8T · 2.84 GHz
Apple M5
100 %
9C / 9T · 4.61 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
8C / 8T · 2.84 GHz
Apple M5
100 %
9C / 9T · 0.91 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Apple M5
100 %
Apple M5 (10 Core)
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 10 Benchmark
25 entries
25 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
90 entries
90 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Apple M5 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Qualcomm Snapdragon (105) | Apple M series (38) |
| CPU group | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (2) | Apple M5 (6) |
| Architecture | Kryo 680 | M5 |
| Technology | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Notebook |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Apple M4 | |
| Successor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Apple M5 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 9 / 9 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 1x Kryo 680 Prime 2.84 GHz |
3x P-Core 0.91 - 4.61 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 3x Kryo 680 Gold 2.42 GHz |
6x E-Core 0.90 - 3.05 GHz |
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Kryo 680 Silver 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 1.00 MB | 28.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Apple M5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Qualcomm Adreno 660 | Apple M5 (10 Core) |
| GPU frequency | 0.84 GHz | 0.34 - 1.90 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | / | 160 / 1280 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Max. displays | 0 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 24 GB | |
| Technology | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Release date | Q1/2021 | Q4/2025 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Apple M5 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Qualcomm AI engine | Apple Neural Engine |
| AI specifications | Hexagon 780 @ 26 TOPS | 16 Neural cores @ 60 TOPS |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Apple M5 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-6400 (51.2 GB/s) | LPDDR5X-9600 (153.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 4.0 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Apple M5 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 17 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 15 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Apple M5 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Android | macOS, iPadOS |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv9.2-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation, AVX2, SME | |
| Release date | Q1/2021 | Q4/2025 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 is 3.8 stars (164 ratings), while Apple M5 has received 4.6 stars (417 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Apple M5
9C / 9T · 4.61 GHz
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
