MediaTek MT6582 vs AMD EPYC 7282
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| MediaTek MT6582 | AMD EPYC 7282 | |
CPU comparisonMediaTek MT6582 or AMD EPYC 7282 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The MediaTek MT6582 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The MediaTek MT6582 was released in Q3/2013. The AMD EPYC 7282 has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7282 was released in Q3/2019. |
||
| Mediatek MT-Serie (72) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| MediaTek MT65xx A7 (14) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 1 | Generation | 2 |
| Cortex-A9 | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe MediaTek MT6582 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the MediaTek MT6582 is 1.30 GHz while the AMD EPYC 7282 has 16 CPU cores and 32 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7282 is at 2.80 GHz (3.20 GHz). |
||
| MediaTek MT6582 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7282 |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.30 GHz | Frequency | 2.80 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.20 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.00 GHz |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The MediaTek MT6582 or AMD EPYC 7282 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.50 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.50 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Utgard | GPU Generation | -- |
| 28nm | Technology | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| 2 | Compute units | -- |
| 32 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 0 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe MediaTek MT6582 can use up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 4.3 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7282 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
| MediaTek MT6582 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7282 |
| LPDDR3-533, LPDDR2-533 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 1 (Single Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 4.3 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 0.51 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 64.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the MediaTek MT6582 is --, while the AMD EPYC 7282 has a TDP of 120 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| MediaTek MT6582 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7282 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 120 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe MediaTek MT6582 is manufactured in 28 nm and has 0.51 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7282 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 64.00 MB cache. |
||
| MediaTek MT6582 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7282 |
| 28 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| -- | Socket | SP3 |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2013 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
| -- | Release price | 1200 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
16C 32T @ 2.80 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
MediaTek MT6582
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7282
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7282
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7282
16C 32T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
ARM Mali-400 MP2 @ 0.50 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7282
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
4C 4T @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7282
16C 32T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| MediaTek MT6582 | AMD EPYC 7282 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
