MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ vs AMD EPYC 9254

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD EPYC 9254
MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ AMD EPYC 9254

CPU comparison

MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ or AMD EPYC 9254 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.60 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ was released in Q2/2020.

The AMD EPYC 9254 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.15 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9254 was released in Q4/2022.
Mediatek Dimensity (36) Family AMD EPYC (129)
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 (4) CPU group AMD EPYC 9004 (21)
1 Generation 4
Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 Architecture Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor AMD EPYC 9255

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.60 GHz. The AMD EPYC 9254 has 24 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.90 GHz (4.15 GHz).

MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ Characteristic AMD EPYC 9254
8 Cores 24
8 Threads 48
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.60 GHz
4x Cortex-A77
A-Core 2.90 GHz (4.15 GHz)
24x Zen 4
2.00 GHz
4x Cortex-A55
B-Core --

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ Characteristic AMD EPYC 9254
Mediatek APU 3.0 AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --
-- NPU + CPU + iGPU --

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

ARM Mali-G77 MP9 GPU no iGPU
0.85 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Vallhall 1 GPU Generation --
7 nm Technology
1 Max. displays
9 Compute units --
144 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G77 MP9 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
Decode Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9254 can connect up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels.

MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ Characteristic AMD EPYC 9254
LPDDR4X-1866 Memory DDR5-4800
16 GB Max. Memory 6144 GB
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 12
29.8 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 460.8 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache 24.00 MB
-- L3 Cache 128.00 MB
-- PCIe version 5.0
-- PCIe lanes 128
-- PCIe Bandwidth 504.1 GB/s

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ has a TDP of --, that of the AMD EPYC 9254 is 200 W.

MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ Characteristic AMD EPYC 9254
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 200 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up 240 W
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. 100 °C

Technical details

The MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ has a 0.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 9254 cache has a total of 152.00 MB.

MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ Characteristic AMD EPYC 9254
7 nm Technology 5 nm
Chiplet Chip design Chiplet
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
-- Socket SP5
None Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11
Q2/2020 Release date Q4/2022
-- Release price 2299 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 5.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 9254 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ (43%)
AMD EPYC 9254 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ (17%)
AMD EPYC 9254 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz
970 (43%)
AMD EPYC 9254 AMD EPYC 9254
24C 48T @ 4.15 GHz
2233 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz
3126 (17%)
AMD EPYC 9254 AMD EPYC 9254
24C 48T @ 3.90 GHz
18023 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz
775 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9254 AMD EPYC 9254
24C 48T @ 4.15 GHz
0 (0%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz
4507 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9254 AMD EPYC 9254
24C 48T @ 3.90 GHz
0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
ARM Mali-G77 MP9 @ 0.85 GHz
979 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9254 AMD EPYC 9254
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz
493583 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9254 AMD EPYC 9254
24C 48T @ 2.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz
4508 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9254 AMD EPYC 9254
24C 48T @ 3.90 GHz
0 (0%)

AI performance (NPU)

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is given here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher.

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
8C 8T @ 2.60 GHz
4.5 (100%)
AMD EPYC 9254 AMD EPYC 9254
24C 48T @ 2.90 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ AMD EPYC 9254
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778GMediaTek Dimensity 1000+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
2. AMD EPYC 9254AMD EPYC 7443P AMD EPYC 9254 vs AMD EPYC 7443P
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
4. MediaTek Dimensity 6080MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
5. MediaTek Helio G96MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ MediaTek Helio G96 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
6. MediaTek Dimensity 1000+MediaTek Dimensity 8100 MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
7. MediaTek Dimensity 1200MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
8. MediaTek Dimensity 1000+Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
10. AMD EPYC 9254AMD EPYC 9124 AMD EPYC 9254 vs AMD EPYC 9124


back to index