Intel Xeon W-3275M vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3275M | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon W-3275M or HiSilicon Kirin 9000 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon W-3275M has 28 cores with 56 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.60 GHz. Up to 2048 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3275M was released in Q2/2019. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.13 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 was released in Q4/2020. |
||
| Intel Xeon W (83) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 (17) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (2) |
| 7 | Generation | 9 |
| Cascade Lake W | Architecture | Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon W-3275M has 28 CPU cores and can calculate 56 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-3275M is 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) while the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has 8 CPU cores and 8 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is at 3.13 GHz. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3275M | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
| 28 | Cores | 8 |
| 56 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) | A-Core | 3.13 GHz 1x Cortex-A77 |
| -- | B-Core | 2.54 GHz 3x Cortex-A77 |
| -- | C-Core | 2.05 GHz 4x Cortex-A55 |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Xeon W-3275M or HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G78 MP24 |
| GPU frequency | 0.76 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | Vallhall 2 |
| Technology | 5 nm | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| -- | Compute units | 24 |
| -- | Shader | 384 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G78 MP24 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon W-3275M can use up to 2048 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 140.7 GB/s. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 supports up to GB of memory in 4 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3275M | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | LPDDR5-2750, LPDDR4X-2133 |
| 2048 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
| 140.7 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 38.50 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 64 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 63.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon W-3275M is 205 W, while the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3275M | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
| 205 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon W-3275M is manufactured in 14 nm and has 38.50 MB cache. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is manufactured in 5 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3275M | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q4/2020 |
| 7450 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
28C 56T @ 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon W-3275M
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275M
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275M
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275M
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275M
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275M
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275M
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275M
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275M
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
ARM Mali-G78 MP24 @ 0.76 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275M
28C 56T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275M
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275M
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
8C 8T @ 3.13 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3275M | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 |
| Apple Mac Pro (2019) | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
