Intel Xeon W-3225 vs AMD EPYC 72F3
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3225 | AMD EPYC 72F3 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon W-3225 or AMD EPYC 72F3 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon W-3225 has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.40 GHz. Up to 1024 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3225 was released in Q2/2019. The AMD EPYC 72F3 has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.10 GHz. The CPU supports up to 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 72F3 was released in Q1/2021. |
||
| Intel Xeon W (83) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 (17) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7003 (29) |
| 7 | Generation | 3 |
| Cascade Lake W | Architecture | Milan (Zen 3) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| Intel Xeon w5-3425 | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon W-3225 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 16 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-3225 is 3.70 GHz (4.40 GHz) while the AMD EPYC 72F3 has 8 CPU cores and 16 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 72F3 is at 3.70 GHz (4.10 GHz). |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3225 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 72F3 |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.70 GHz | Frequency | 3.70 GHz |
| 4.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 4.10 GHz |
| 4.20 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.90 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon W-3225 can use up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 128.1 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 72F3 supports up to 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 204.8 GB/s. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3225 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 72F3 |
| DDR4-2666 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 1024 GB | Max. Memory | 4096 GB |
| 6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 128.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 16.50 MB | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 64 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 63.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon W-3225 is 160 W, while the AMD EPYC 72F3 has a TDP of 180 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3225 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 72F3 |
| 160 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 180 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | 200 W |
| -- | TDP down | 165 W |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon W-3225 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 16.50 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 72F3 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 256.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3225 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 72F3 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | SP3 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q1/2021 |
| 1199 $ | Release price | 2468 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz (4.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 16T @ 3.70 GHz (4.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
8C 16T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 72F3
8C 16T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 72F3
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
8C 16T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 72F3
8C 16T @ 4.10 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 72F3
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3225
8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 72F3
8C 16T @ 3.90 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3225 | AMD EPYC 72F3 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
