Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs AMD EPYC 7642
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y | AMD EPYC 7642 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon Platinum 8352Y or AMD EPYC 7642 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 32 cores with 64 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. Up to 6144 GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y was released in Q2/2021. The AMD EPYC 7642 has 48 cores with 96 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7642 was released in Q3/2019. |
||
| Intel Xeon Platinum (89) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8300 (12) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 3 | Generation | 2 |
| Ice Lake | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | AMD EPYC 7643 |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 32 CPU cores and can calculate 64 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y is 2.20 GHz (3.40 GHz) while the AMD EPYC 7642 has 48 CPU cores and 96 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7642 is at 2.30 GHz (3.30 GHz). |
||
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7642 |
| 32 | Cores | 48 |
| 64 | Threads | 96 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.30 GHz |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.30 GHz |
| 2.60 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 2.80 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y can use up to 6144 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 204.8 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7642 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7642 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 6144 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 204.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 48.00 MB | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 64 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 126.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y is 205 W, while the AMD EPYC 7642 has a TDP of 225 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7642 |
| 205 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 225 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y is manufactured in 10 nm and has 48.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7642 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 256.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7642 |
| 10 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| LGA 4189 | Socket | SP3 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2021 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
| 3450 $ | Release price | 8000 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
32C 64T @ 2.20 GHz (3.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
48C 96T @ 2.30 GHz (3.30 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
32C 64T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7642
48C 96T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
32C 64T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7642
48C 96T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
32C 64T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7642
48C 96T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
32C 64T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7642
48C 96T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
32C 64T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7642
48C 96T @ 3.30 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
32C 64T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7642
48C 96T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y | AMD EPYC 7642 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
