Intel Xeon Gold 5416S vs AMD EPYC 7F72
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S | AMD EPYC 7F72 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon Gold 5416S or AMD EPYC 7F72 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon Gold 5416S has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.00 GHz. Up to 4096 GB of memory is supported in 8 memory channels. The Intel Xeon Gold 5416S was released in Q1/2023. The AMD EPYC 7F72 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7F72 was released in Q2/2020. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold (163) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Xeon Gold 5400/6400 (25) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 4 | Generation | 2 |
| Sapphire Rapids | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon Gold 5416S has 16 CPU cores and can calculate 32 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon Gold 5416S is 2.00 GHz (4.00 GHz) while the AMD EPYC 7F72 has 24 CPU cores and 48 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7F72 is at 3.20 GHz (3.70 GHz). |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7F72 |
| 16 | Cores | 24 |
| 32 | Threads | 48 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.00 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| 4.00 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.70 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.50 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon Gold 5416S can use up to 4096 GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 281.6 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7F72 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7F72 |
| DDR5-4400 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 4096 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 8 (Octa Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 281.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 30.00 MB | L3 Cache | 192.00 MB |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| 80 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 315.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon Gold 5416S is 150 W, while the AMD EPYC 7F72 has a TDP of 240 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7F72 |
| 150 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 240 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon Gold 5416S is manufactured in 10 nm and has 30.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7F72 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 192.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7F72 |
| 10 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| LGA 4677 | Socket | SP3 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2023 | Release date | Q2/2020 |
| 944 $ | Release price | 2450 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
16C 32T @ 2.00 GHz (4.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
24C 48T @ 3.20 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
16C 32T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
16C 32T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
16C 32T @ 4.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7F72
24C 48T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon Gold 5416S | AMD EPYC 7F72 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
