Intel Xeon E-2378 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon E-2378 | Samsung Exynos 8895 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Xeon E-2378 and the Samsung Exynos 8895 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Intel Xeon E-2378 8 core processor released in Q3/2021 with the Samsung Exynos 8895 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2017. |
||
| Intel Xeon E (44) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| Intel Xeon E-2300 (10) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 8895 (1) |
| 3 | Generation | 2 |
| Rocket Lake S | Architecture | Exynos M2 / Cortex-A53 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon E-2378 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.60 GHz (4.80 GHz). The processor can compute 16 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 8895 clocks with 2.30 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
| Intel Xeon E-2378 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 8895 |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.60 GHz (4.80 GHz) | A-Core | 2.30 GHz 4x Exynos M2 (Mongoose) |
| -- | B-Core | 1.70 GHz 4x Cortex-A53 |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G71 MP20 |
| GPU frequency | 0.90 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | Bifrost 1 |
| Technology | 16 nm | |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| -- | Compute units | 20 |
| -- | Shader | 320 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 11 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-G71 MP20 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to 128 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Xeon E-2378, while the Samsung Exynos 8895 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
| Intel Xeon E-2378 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 8895 |
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR4-1866 |
| 128 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 51.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| 4.00 MB | L2 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| 16.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 39.4 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe Intel Xeon E-2378 has a TDP of 65 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 8895 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Intel Xeon E-2378 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 8895 |
| 65 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon E-2378 has 20.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 8895 is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 10 nm. |
||
| Intel Xeon E-2378 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 8895 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
| LGA 1200 | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q3/2021 | Release date | Q2/2017 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz (4.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Intel Xeon E-2378
8C 16T @ 4.80 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2378
8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2378
8C 16T @ 4.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2378
8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2378
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 8895
ARM Mali-G71 MP20 @ 0.90 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2378
8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon E-2378
8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 8895
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon E-2378 | Samsung Exynos 8895 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
