Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Apple A14 Bionic
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Samsung Exynos 8895
20 %
8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Samsung Exynos 8895
29 %
8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Samsung Exynos 8895
23 %
8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Samsung Exynos 8895
33 %
8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Samsung Exynos 8895
82 %
ARM Mali-G71 MP20
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
Apple A14
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
Samsung Exynos 8895
28 %
8C / 8T · 2.30 GHz
Apple A14 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.00 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 8895 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Samsung Exynos (49) | Apple A series (27) |
| CPU group | Samsung Exynos 8895 (1) | Apple A14 (1) |
| Architecture | Exynos M2 / Cortex-A53 | A14 (Firestorm/Icestorm) |
| Technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Apple A13 Bionic | |
| Successor | Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 8895 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 6 / 6 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Exynos M2 (Mongoose) 2.30 GHz |
2x Firestorm 3.00 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Cortex-A53 1.70 GHz |
4x Icestorm 1.82 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 2.00 MB | 12.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 16.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 8895 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-G71 MP20 | Apple A14 |
| GPU frequency | 0.90 - 0.90 GHz | 1.46 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 20 / 320 | 16 / 256 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Technology | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2016 | Q3/2020 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 8895 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 16 Neural cores @ 11 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 8895 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4-1866 | LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 6 GB | |
| Memory channels | 0 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 8895 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7.25 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 8895 | Apple A14 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android | iOS |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q2/2017 | Q3/2020 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Samsung Exynos 8895 is 3.9 stars (7 ratings), while Apple A14 Bionic has received 3.9 stars (243 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
8
Apple A14 Bionic
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
9
Samsung Exynos 8895
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
