Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Intel Core i9-13900H

Last updated: 2024-04-25

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4		Intel Core i9-13900H
CPU comparison Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 or Intel Core i9-13900H - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results. The Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. Up to 1536 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 was released in Q1/2016. The Intel Core i9-13900H has 14 cores with 20 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 5.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to 96 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core i9-13900H was released in Q1/2023.

Intel Xeon E5 (71)	Family	Intel Core i9 (78)
Intel Xeon E5 v4 (24)	CPU group	Intel Core i 13000H (26)
6	Generation	13
Broadwell E	Architecture	Raptor Lake H
Desktop / Server	Segment	Mobile
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3	Predecessor	Intel Core i9-12900H
--	Successor	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 16 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 is 2.10 GHz (3.00 GHz) while the Intel Core i9-13900H has 14 CPU cores and 20 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Core i9-13900H is at 2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz).
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4	Characteristic	Intel Core i9-13900H
8	Cores	14
16	Threads	20
normal	Core architecture	hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes	Hyperthreading	Yes
No	Overclocking ?	No
2.10 GHz (3.00 GHz)	A-Core	2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz) 6x Raptor Cove
--	B-Core	1.90 GHz (4.10 GHz) 8x Gracemont
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4	Characteristic	Intel Core i9-13900H
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics The Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 or Intel Core i9-13900H has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.
no iGPU	GPU	Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake)
	GPU frequency	0.40 GHz
--	GPU (Turbo)	1.50 GHz
--	GPU Generation	13
	Technology	10 nm
	Max. displays	4
--	Compute units	96
--	Shader	768
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
--	Max. GPU Memory	32 GB
--	DirectX Version	12.1

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU	GPU	Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake)
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	Decode / Encode
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	Decode / Encode
No	Codec h264	Decode / Encode
No	Codec VP9	Decode / Encode
No	Codec VP8	Decode
No	Codec AV1	Decode
No	Codec AVC	Decode / Encode
No	Codec VC-1	Decode
No	Codec JPEG	Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe The Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 can use up to 1536 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 68.2 GB/s. The Intel Core i9-13900H supports up to 96 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 102.4 GB/s.
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4	Characteristic	Intel Core i9-13900H
DDR4-2133	Memory	LPDDR5-6400, LPDDR4X-4266, DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200
1536 GB	Max. Memory	96 GB
4 (Quad Channel)	Memory channels	2 (Dual Channel)
68.2 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	102.4 GB/s
Yes	ECC	No
--	L2 Cache	--
20.00 MB	L3 Cache	24.00 MB
3.0	PCIe version	5.0
40	PCIe lanes	20
39.4 GB/s	PCIe Bandwidth	78.8 GB/s
Thermal Management The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 is 85 W, while the Intel Core i9-13900H has a TDP of 45 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4	Characteristic	Intel Core i9-13900H
85 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	45 W
--	TDP (PL2)	115 W
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	35 W
--	Tjunction max.	100 °C
Technical details The Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 is manufactured in 14 nm and has 20.00 MB cache. The Intel Core i9-13900H is manufactured in 10 nm and has a 24.00 MB cache.
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4	Characteristic	Intel Core i9-13900H
14 nm	Technology	10 nm
Monolithic	Chip design	Monolithic
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2	ISA extensions	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
LGA 2011-3	Socket	BGA 1744
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d	Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Yes	AES-NI	Yes
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems	Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux
Q1/2016	Release date	Q1/2023
420 $	Release price	700 $

show more data		show more data

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 2.10 GHz (3.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save! Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 2.60 GHz (5.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 (39%)

Intel Core i9-13900H (100%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 4 CPU benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 (40%)

Intel Core i9-13900H (100%)

Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz	43 (37%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.40 GHz	115 (100%)

Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz	581 (61%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.40 GHz	951 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz	821 (43%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.40 GHz	1919 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz	4936 (34%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.00 GHz	14632 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz	1004 (38%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.40 GHz	2617 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz	4852 (36%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.00 GHz	13629 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz	9268 (29%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.00 GHz	31788 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.40 GHz	2016 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.00 GHz	18760 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz	259 (100%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.40 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz	4349 (100%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.00 GHz	0 (0%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 0.00 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake) @ 1.50 GHz	2230 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 2.10 GHz	2785 (100%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 2.60 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 3.00 GHz	125 (100%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.40 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 8C 16T @ 2.60 GHz	1096 (100%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 14C 20T @ 5.00 GHz	0 (0%)

CPU performance per watt (efficiency)

Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.


	Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 2.10 GHz	0 (0%)
	Intel Core i9-13900H 18,760 CB R23 MC @ 87 W	216 (100%)

Devices using this processor
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4	Intel Core i9-13900H
Unknown	Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs


1.		Apple M3 vs Intel Core i9-13900H
2.		Intel Core i9-13900H vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
3.		Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i7-13700H
4.		Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i9-13900HX
5.		Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
6.		Intel Core i9-12900H vs Intel Core i9-13900H
7.		Intel Core i7-1360P vs Intel Core i9-13900H
8.		AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Intel Core i9-13900H
9.		Intel Xeon Silver 4110 vs Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
10.		Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core i7-12700H