Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 vs AMD FX-8100
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 | AMD FX-8100 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon E5-2608L v3 or AMD FX-8100 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. Up to 768 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 was released in Q3/2014. The AMD FX-8100 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-8100 was released in Q4/2011. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5 (71) | Family | AMD FX (30) |
| Intel Xeon E5 v3 (32) | CPU group | AMD FX-8000 (11) |
| 5 | Generation | 2 |
| Haswell E | Architecture | Vishera (Bulldozer) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 is a 6 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz. The AMD FX-8100 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz (3.70 GHz). |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8100 |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 2.00 GHz | Frequency | 2.80 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.70 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.70 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 supports a maximum of 768 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The AMD FX-8100 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8100 |
| DDR4-2133 | Memory | DDR3-1866 |
| 768 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 68.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 15.00 MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 40 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 39.4 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 has a TDP of 52 W, that of the AMD FX-8100 is 95 W. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8100 |
| 52 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 has a 15.00 MB cache, while the AMD FX-8100 cache has a total of 8.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8100 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 |
| LGA 2011-3 | Socket | AM3+ |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2014 | Release date | Q4/2011 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
6C 12T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
6C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
AMD FX-8100
8C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
6C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8100
8C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
6C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8100
8C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
6C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8100
8C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3
6C 12T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8100
8C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 | AMD FX-8100 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
