Intel Processor U300 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Processor U300 CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 710
Intel Processor U300 HiSilicon Kirin 710

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Processor U300 and the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Processor U300 5 core processor released in Q1/2023 with the HiSilicon Kirin 710 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2018.
Intel Processor U (4) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
Intel Core i 1300P/1300U (29) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1)
13 Generation 5
Raptor Lake U Architecture Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Processor U300 is a 5 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.20 GHz (4.40 GHz). The processor can compute 6 threads at the same time. The HiSilicon Kirin 710 clocks with 2.20 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

Intel Processor U300 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
5 Cores 8
6 Threads 8
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.20 GHz (4.40 GHz)
1x Raptor Cove
A-Core 2.20 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
0.90 GHz (3.30 GHz)
4x Gracemont
B-Core 1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Intel Processor U300 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Intel UHD Graphics 13th Gen (48 EU) GPU ARM Mali-G51 MP4
0.20 GHz GPU frequency 0.65 GHz
1.10 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.00 GHz
13 GPU Generation Bifrost 1
10 nm Technology 12 nm
3 Max. displays 2
48 Compute units 8
384 Shader 128
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
32 GB Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
12.1 DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel UHD Graphics 13th Gen (48 EU) GPU ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to 96 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Processor U300, while the HiSilicon Kirin 710 supports a maximum of 6 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

Intel Processor U300 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4X-4266, DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200 Memory LPDDR4, LPDDR3
96 GB Max. Memory 6 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
83.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
10.00 MB L3 Cache 1.00 MB
4.0 PCIe version --
20 PCIe lanes --
39.4 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Intel Processor U300 has a TDP of 15 W. The TDP of the HiSilicon Kirin 710 is 5 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Intel Processor U300 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
15 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 5 W
55 W TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
12 W TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Processor U300 has 10.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 10 nm. The cache of HiSilicon Kirin 710 is at 1.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 12 nm.

Intel Processor U300 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
10 nm Technology 12 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 ISA extensions --
BGA 1744 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux Operating systems Android
Q1/2023 Release date Q3/2018
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Processor U300 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.3 stars (7 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 710 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.6 stars (8 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Processor U300 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 (16%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Intel Processor U300 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 (24%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Processor U300 Intel Processor U300
5C 6T @ 4.40 GHz
2158 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
348 (16%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Processor U300 Intel Processor U300
5C 6T @ 1.20 GHz
5096 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
1206 (24%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Processor U300 Intel Processor U300
Intel UHD Graphics 13th Gen (48 EU) @ 1.10 GHz
844 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
ARM Mali-G51 MP4 @ 1.00 GHz
166 (20%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Processor U300 Intel Processor U300
5C 6T @ 4.40 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
322 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Processor U300 Intel Processor U300
5C 6T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
1384 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Processor U300 Intel Processor U300
5C 6T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
224605 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Processor U300 Intel Processor U300
5C 6T @ 1.20 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
196747 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Processor U300 Intel Processor U300
5C 6T @ 1.20 GHz
9341 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Processor U300 HiSilicon Kirin 710
Unknown Huawei Honor 8X
Huawei P30 lite

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GHiSilicon Kirin 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665HiSilicon Kirin 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662HiSilicon Kirin 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
4. HiSilicon Kirin 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
5. HiSilicon Kirin 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6. HiSilicon Kirin 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GHiSilicon Kirin 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
8. HiSilicon Kirin 710HiSilicon Kirin 810 HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
9. HiSilicon Kirin 710HiSilicon Kirin 960 HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730HiSilicon Kirin 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710


back to index