Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Atom x7211E
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Processor N200
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake)
Intel Atom x7211E
67 %
Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Alder Lake)
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | Intel Atom x7211E |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Processor N (9) | Intel Atom (108) |
| CPU group | Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5) | Intel Atom x7000 (3) |
| Architecture | Alder Lake N | Alder Lake N |
| Technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA | BGA 1264 |
| Predecessor | Intel Atom x6211E | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | Intel Atom x7211E |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x Gracemont | 2x |
| Frequency: | 1.80 GHz | 1.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.70 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.40 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 4.00 MB | 1.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 6.00 MB | 6.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | Intel Atom x7211E |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake) | Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Alder Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 - 0.75 GHz | 0.40 - 1.00 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 32 / 256 | 16 / 128 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Technology | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q1/2023 | Q1/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | Intel Atom x7211E |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | Intel Atom x7211E |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) | LPDDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 9 | 3.0 x 9 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.9 GB/s | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | Intel Atom x7211E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | 6 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Processor N200 | Intel Atom x7211E |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q1/2023 | Q1/2023 |
| Release price | 193 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Processor N200 is 3.4 stars (105 ratings), while Intel Atom x7211E has received 4.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Atom x7211E
2C / 2T · 3.20 GHz
9
Intel Processor N200
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Popular Comparisons
