Intel Processor N200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 910
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Processor N200 | HiSilicon Kirin 910 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Processor N200 or HiSilicon Kirin 910 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Processor N200 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. Up to 16 GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The Intel Processor N200 was released in Q1/2023. The HiSilicon Kirin 910 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 910 was released in Q1/2014. |
||
| Intel Processor N (5) | Family | HiSilicon Kirin (29) |
| Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5) | CPU group | HiSilicon Kirin 910 (2) |
| 13 | Generation | 1 |
| Alder Lake N | Architecture | Cortex-A9 |
| Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Processor N200 has 4 CPU cores and can calculate 4 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Processor N200 is 1.80 GHz (3.70 GHz) while the HiSilicon Kirin 910 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the HiSilicon Kirin 910 is at 1.60 GHz. |
||
| Intel Processor N200 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 910 |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.80 GHz | Frequency | 1.60 GHz |
| 3.70 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Processor N200 or HiSilicon Kirin 910 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake) | GPU | ARM Mali-450 MP4 |
| 0.40 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.53 GHz |
| 0.75 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.53 GHz |
| 12 | GPU Generation | Utgard |
| 10 nm | Technology | 28nm |
| 3 | Max. displays | 1 |
| 32 | Compute units | 4 |
| 256 | Shader | 64 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 8 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 0 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake) | GPU | ARM Mali-450 MP4 |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| Decode | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Processor N200 can use up to 16 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 38.4 GB/s. The HiSilicon Kirin 910 supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| Intel Processor N200 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 910 |
| LPDDR5-4800, DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR3 |
| 16 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 1 (Single Channel) | Memory channels | 1 (Single Channel) |
| 38.4 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| 4.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| 6.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 9 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 8.9 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Processor N200 is 6 W, while the HiSilicon Kirin 910 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Intel Processor N200 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 910 |
| 6 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 105 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Processor N200 is manufactured in 10 nm and has 10.00 MB cache. The HiSilicon Kirin 910 is manufactured in 28 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache. |
||
| Intel Processor N200 | Characteristic | HiSilicon Kirin 910 |
| 10 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 | ISA extensions | -- |
| BGA | Socket | -- |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q1/2023 | Release date | Q1/2014 |
| 193 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
4C 4T @ 1.80 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Intel Processor N200
Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Alder Lake) @ 0.75 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
ARM Mali-450 MP4 @ 0.53 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
Intel Processor N200
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
Intel Processor N200
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Processor N200
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Processor N200
4C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Processor N200
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Processor N200
4C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Processor N200
4C 4T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Processor N200
4C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Processor N200
4C 4T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Processor N200 | HiSilicon Kirin 910 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
