Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7-3820
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
100 %
20C / 20T · 5.30 GHz
Intel Core i7-3820
23 %
4C / 8T · 3.80 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
100 %
20C / 20T · 4.60 GHz
Intel Core i7-3820
13 %
4C / 8T · 3.60 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core Ultra 7 (31) | Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition (24) |
| CPU group | Intel Core Ultra 200 AL-S (20) | Intel Core i 3000X (4) |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake | Sandy Bridge E |
| Technology | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 1851 | LGA 2011 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 4 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 8x Lion Cove 2.40 - 5.30 GHz |
4x 3.60 - 3.80 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 12x Skymont 1.80 - 4.60 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 36.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 33.00 MB | 10.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | ||
| CUs / Shader | / | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | ||
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | ||
| Release date |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel AI Boost NPU 4 @ 13 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) | DDR3-1600 (51.2 GB/s) DDR3-1333 (42.6 GB/s) DDR3-1066 (34.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 20 | 2.0 x 40 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 78.8 GB/s | 20.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 130 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 182 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 11, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| Release date | Q1/2025 | Q1/2012 |
| Release price | 369 $ | 305 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is 3.9 stars (34 ratings), while Intel Core i7-3820 has received 3.4 stars (7 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
20C / 20T · 5.30 GHz
9
Intel Core i7-3820
4C / 8T · 3.80 GHz
Popular Comparisons
