Share link|

Submit benchmark

Comparison Search Benchmarks CPUs Leaderboards CPU News & Articles GPU comparison Apple product comparison

Deutsch English Español Français Italiano Japanese

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F Benchmark, Test and specs

Name: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Brand: Intel
Rating: 4.1 (10 reviews)

Last updated: 2025-05-26

High-end CPU that is good in applications and games. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20 core processor. It can handle 20 threads simultaneously and was introduced in Q1/2025. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is based on the 2. generation of the Intel Core Ultra 7 series and requires a mainboard with the socket LGA 1851.

At a glance
Name:	Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Family:	Intel Core Ultra 7 (24)
CPU group:	Intel Core Ultra 200 AL-S (17)
Architecture:	Arrow Lake
Technology:	3 nm
Segment:	Desktop
Generation:	2
Predecessor:	--
Successor:	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The 20 CPU cores of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F clock with 2.40 GHz (5.30 GHz). The number of CPU cores and the clock frequency of the processor are largely responsible for the overall performance.

CPU Cores / Threads:	20 / 20
Core architecture:	hybrid (big.LITTLE)
A-Core:	8x Lion Cove
B-Core:	12x Skymont

Hyperthreading / SMT:	No
Overclocking:	Intel Turbo Boost Max
A-Core Frequency:	2.40 GHz (5.30 GHz)
B-Core Frequency:	1.80 GHz (4.60 GHz)

NPU AI performance

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

AI hardware:	Intel® AI Boost
AI specifications:	Intel AI Boost NPU 4 @ 13 TOPS
NPU + CPU + iGPU:	--

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

With the no iGPU, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has an build in graphic solution. It has -- SM processors, which have a total of -- texture shaders. The iGPU not only enables games, but also significantly accelerates video playback.

Max. displays:
Generation:	--
Direct X:	--
Technology:
Max. GPU Memory:	--
Frame Generation:	No

Hardware codec support

Processors that have an integrated graphics can play videos faster and more efficiently. This can have a positive effect on the battery life of notebooks, for example.

AV1:	No
AVC:	No
VC-1:	No
JPEG:	No

Memory type:	Memory bandwidth:
Memory & PCIe The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F supports up to 256 GB memory in up to 2 (Dual Channel) memory channels. This results in a maximum memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

DDR5-6400	102.4 GB/s
Max. Memory:	256 GB
Memory channels:	2 (Dual Channel)
ECC:	Yes
PCIe:	5.0 x 20
PCIe Bandwidth:	78.8 GB/s

Thermal Management With the TDP, the processor manufacturer specifies the cooling solution required for the processor. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has a TDP of 65 W.

TDP (PL1 / PBP):	65 W
TDP (PL2):	182 W
TDP up:	--
TDP down:	--
Tjunction max.:	105 °C

Technical details

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F has a 69.00 MB large cache. The processor is manufactured in 3 nm. Modern production increases the efficiency of the processor.

Technology:	3 nm
Chip design:	Monolithic
Socket:	LGA 1851
L2-Cache:	36.00 MB
L3-Cache:	33.00 MB
AES-NI:	Yes
Operating systems:	Windows 11, Linux

Virtualization:	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Instruction set (ISA):	x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions:	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
Release date:	Q1/2025
Release price:	369 $
Part Number:	--
Documents:	Technical data sheet

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
20C 20T @ 2.40 GHz (5.30 GHz)

buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate this processor

Here you can rate this processor to help other visitors make their purchase decision. The average rating of this processor is 4.1 stars (10 ratings). Rate now:

Benchmark results

The benchmark results for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F have been carefully checked by us. We only publish benchmark results that have been created by us or that have been submitted by a visitor and then checked by a team member. All results are based on and fullfill our benchmark guidelines.

Cinebench 2024 Single-Core

The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	AMD Ryzen 9 9900X 12C 24T @ 5.60 GHz	137
	AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D 12C 24T @ 5.50 GHz	137
	Intel Core i9-13900KS 24C 32T @ 6.00 GHz	137
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20C 20T @ 5.30 GHz	136
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265 20C 20T @ 5.30 GHz	136
	AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8C 16T @ 5.25 GHz	135
	Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF 14C 14T @ 5.20 GHz	135

Cinebench 2024 Multi-Core

The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.


	Intel Core Ultra 5 245K 14C 14T @ 5.20 GHz	1484
	Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF 14C 14T @ 5.20 GHz	1484
	AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT 16C 32T @ 4.80 GHz	1483
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20C 20T @ 5.30 GHz	1409
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265 20C 20T @ 5.30 GHz	1409
	Intel Core i7-13700F 16C 24T @ 5.20 GHz	1398
	Intel Core i7-13700 16C 24T @ 5.20 GHz	1398

Cinebench R23 Single-Core

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	Intel Core i7-14700K 20C 28T @ 5.60 GHz	2228
	Intel Core i7-14700KF 20C 28T @ 5.60 GHz	2228
	AMD Ryzen 7 9700X 8C 16T @ 5.50 GHz	2206
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20C 20T @ 5.30 GHz	2202
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265 20C 20T @ 5.30 GHz	2202
	Intel Core Ultra 5 245K 14C 14T @ 5.20 GHz	2175
	Intel Core i9-13900 24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz	2165

Cinebench R23 Multi-Core

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D 12C 24T @ 5.20 GHz	27084
	Intel Core i9-12900 16C 24T @ 4.20 GHz	26455
	Intel Core i9-12900F 16C 24T @ 4.20 GHz	26455
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20C 20T @ 4.60 GHz	25459
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265 20C 20T @ 5.10 GHz	25459
	Intel Core Ultra 5 245K 14C 14T @ 5.00 GHz	25188
	Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF 14C 14T @ 5.00 GHz	25188

Geekbench 6 Single-Core

Geekbench 6 is a partial load benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. In the single-core test, only the fastest CPU core is measured. The test run simulates the performance in practice.


	AMD Ryzen 5 9600 6C 12T @ 5.20 GHz	3167
	Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU) 28C 28T @ 4.06 GHz	3125
	Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU) 32C 32T @ 4.06 GHz	3125
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20C 20T @ 5.30 GHz	3115
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265 20C 20T @ 5.30 GHz	3115
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265T 20C 20T @ 5.30 GHz	3109
	Intel Core Ultra 5 245K 14C 14T @ 5.20 GHz	3048

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

The practical Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark tests the system's performance under partial load. The processor's maximum power consumption is far from being used up.


	AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16C 32T @ 4.50 GHz	21079
	Intel Core i9-13900KS 24C 32T @ 5.60 GHz	20947
	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16C 32T @ 5.20 GHz	20756
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20C 20T @ 4.60 GHz	20735
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265 20C 20T @ 5.10 GHz	20735
	Intel Core i9-14900 24C 32T @ 5.40 GHz	20495
	Intel Core i9-14900F 24C 32T @ 5.40 GHz	20495

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D 12C 24T @ 5.20 GHz	51275
	Intel Xeon Gold 6314U 32C 64T @ 2.70 GHz	51067
	AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX 16C 32T @ 4.20 GHz	49395
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20C 20T @ 4.60 GHz	49325
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265 20C 20T @ 5.10 GHz	49325
	AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 12C 24T @ 4.70 GHz	49250
	AMD Ryzen 9 7900 12C 24T @ 4.70 GHz	49250

AI performance (NPU)

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is given here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher.

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).


	AMD Ryzen 5 8600G 6C 12T @ 4.30 GHz	16
	AMD Ryzen 7 8700G 8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz	16
	AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8700G 8C 16T @ 4.20 GHz	16
	Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 20C 20T @ 2.40 GHz	13
	Intel Core Ultra 5 225T 10C 10T @ 2.50 GHz	13
	Intel Core Ultra 5 235T 14C 14T @ 2.20 GHz	13
	Intel Core Ultra 5 245T 14C 14T @ 2.20 GHz	13

Benchmarks

Cinebench 2024 (SC)
364 entries

Cinebench 2024 (MC)
361 entries

Cinebench R23 (SC)
647 entries

Cinebench R23 (MC)
628 entries

Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,888 entries

Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,822 entries

PassMark CPU-Mark
2,459 entries

AI performance (NPU)
182 entries

Popular comparisons


1.		Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
2.		Intel Core i7-14700F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
3.		Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
4.		Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265
5.		AMD Ryzen 7 9700X vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
6.		Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
7.		AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
8.		Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i7-14700
9.		AMD Ryzen 7 8700F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
10.		Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

back to index

GPU name:	no iGPU
GPU frequency:
GPU (Turbo):	No turbo
Compute units:	--
Shader:	--
Hardware Raytracing:	No
Release date:

h265 / HEVC (8 bit):	No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit):	No
h264:	No
VP8:	No
VP9:	No