Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core i5-14600
Last updated:
Summary
The Intel Core i5-14600 (Raptor Lake S Refresh), manufactured using the 10 nm process, is a desktop processor for the mainstream market.
It offers solid performance for productivity and gaming with integrated Intel UHD Graphics 770, 90 GB/s max. memory bandwidth, and 20 MB L2 and 24 MB L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 (Arrow Lake), manufactured using the more advanced 3 nm process, is aimed at demanding desktop users.
It features more powerful Intel Xe 4 Core Graphics (64 EUs), 102 GB/s max. memory bandwidth, 36 MB L2 and 33 MB L3 cache. Both CPUs support PCIe 5.0. In synthetic benchmarks, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 surpasses the Intel Core i5-14600 in single-core and multi-core performance by more than 10 percent.
For gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is more advantageous due to its better single-core performance and larger caches, which can lead to higher frame rates. The 3 nm manufacturing process of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 also promises better energy efficiency than the 10 nm process of the Intel Core i5-14600.
The price/performance ratio cannot be evaluated without current market prices. The Intel Core i5-14600 is ideal for the budget-conscious user with everyday tasks. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is the first choice for users who need maximum performance and efficiency for demanding applications and high-end gaming.
It offers solid performance for productivity and gaming with integrated Intel UHD Graphics 770, 90 GB/s max. memory bandwidth, and 20 MB L2 and 24 MB L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 (Arrow Lake), manufactured using the more advanced 3 nm process, is aimed at demanding desktop users.
It features more powerful Intel Xe 4 Core Graphics (64 EUs), 102 GB/s max. memory bandwidth, 36 MB L2 and 33 MB L3 cache. Both CPUs support PCIe 5.0. In synthetic benchmarks, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 surpasses the Intel Core i5-14600 in single-core and multi-core performance by more than 10 percent.
For gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is more advantageous due to its better single-core performance and larger caches, which can lead to higher frame rates. The 3 nm manufacturing process of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 also promises better energy efficiency than the 10 nm process of the Intel Core i5-14600.
The price/performance ratio cannot be evaluated without current market prices. The Intel Core i5-14600 is ideal for the budget-conscious user with everyday tasks. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is the first choice for users who need maximum performance and efficiency for demanding applications and high-end gaming.
Intel Core i5-14600
- Architecture: Raptor Lake S Refresh
- Manufacturing: 10 nm
- Integrated Graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 770
- Suitable for mainstream applications and gaming
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
- Architecture: Arrow Lake
- Manufacturing: 3 nm
- Integrated Graphics: Intel Xe 4 Core Graphics (64 EUs)
- Superior performance for demanding workloads
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
100 %
20C / 20T · 5.30 GHz
Intel Core i5-14600
89 %
14C / 20T · 5.20 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
100 %
20C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
Intel Core i5-14600
78 %
14C / 20T · 5.00 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
100 %
Intel Xe 4 Core Graphics 64 EUs (Arrow Lake)
Intel Core i5-14600
40 %
Intel UHD Graphics 770
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | Intel Core i5-14600 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core Ultra 7 (31) | Intel Core i5 (336) |
| CPU group | Intel Core Ultra 200 AL-S (20) | Intel Core i 14000 (34) |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake | Raptor Lake S Refresh |
| Technology | 3 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 1851 | LGA 1700 |
| Predecessor | Intel Core i5-13600 | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | Intel Core i5-14600 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 8x Lion Cove 2.40 - 5.30 GHz |
6x Raptor Cove 2.70 - 5.20 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 12x Skymont 1.80 - 4.60 GHz |
8x Gracemont 2.00 - 3.90 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 36.00 MB | 20.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 33.00 MB | 24.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | Intel Core i5-14600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel Xe 4 Core Graphics 64 EUs (Arrow Lake) | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 - 1.95 GHz | 0.30 - 1.50 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 512 | 32 / 256 |
| Raytracing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Technology | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2024 | Q4/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | Intel Core i5-14600 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel AI Boost NPU 4 @ 13 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU | 37 TOPS |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | Intel Core i5-14600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) | DDR5-5600 (89.6 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 256 GB | 192 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 20 | 5.0 x 20 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 78.8 GB/s | 78.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | Intel Core i5-14600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 182 W | 154 W |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | Intel Core i5-14600 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 11, Linux | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ |
| Release date | Q1/2025 | Q1/2024 |
| Release price | 384 $ | 255 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is 3.0 stars (116 ratings), while Intel Core i5-14600 has received 4.4 stars (20 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
4
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
8
Intel Core i5-14600
14C / 20T · 5.20 GHz
9
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
20C / 20T · 5.30 GHz
Popular Comparisons
