Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs AMD EPYC 4464P
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | AMD EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core Ultra 7 (31) | AMD EPYC (147) |
| CPU group | Intel Core Ultra 200 AL-S (20) | AMD EPYC 4004 (9) |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake | Raphael (Zen 4) |
| Technology | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Server |
| Socket | LGA 1851 | AM5 (LGA 1718) |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | AMD EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 12 / 24 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 8x Lion Cove 2.40 - 5.30 GHz |
12x Zen 4 3.70 - 5.40 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 12x Skymont 1.80 - 4.60 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 36.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 33.00 MB | 64.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | AMD EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel Xe 4 Core Graphics 64 EUs (Arrow Lake) | AMD Radeon Graphics (Raphael) |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 - 1.95 GHz | 0.01 - 0.01 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 512 | 2 / 128 |
| Raytracing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2024 | Q3/2022 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | AMD EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel AI Boost NPU 4 @ 13 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU | 37 TOPS |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | AMD EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) | DDR5-5200 (83.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 256 GB | 192 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 20 | 5.0 x 28 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 78.8 GB/s | 110.3 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | AMD EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 182 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 | AMD EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 11, Linux | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| Release date | Q1/2025 | Q2/2024 |
| Release price | 384 $ | 429 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is 3.0 stars (116 ratings), while AMD EPYC 4464P has received 5.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
AMD EPYC 4464P
12C / 24T · 5.40 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
5
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
6
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
8
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
9
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
20C / 20T · 5.30 GHz
Popular Comparisons
