Intel Core m3-7Y30 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Core m3-7Y30 CPU1 vs CPU2 HiSilicon Kirin 710
Intel Core m3-7Y30 HiSilicon Kirin 710

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Core m3-7Y30 and the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Core m3-7Y30 2 core processor released in Q3/2016 with the HiSilicon Kirin 710 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2018.
Intel Core M (16) Family HiSilicon Kirin (29)
Intel Core M 7 (2) CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1)
7 Generation 5
Kaby Lake Y Architecture Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Core m3-7Y30 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.00 GHz (2.60 GHz). The processor can compute 4 threads at the same time. The HiSilicon Kirin 710 clocks with 2.20 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

Intel Core m3-7Y30 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
2 Cores 8
4 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.00 GHz (2.60 GHz) A-Core 2.20 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
-- B-Core 1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Intel Core m3-7Y30 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU ARM Mali-G51 MP4
0.30 GHz GPU frequency 0.65 GHz
0.90 GHz GPU (Turbo) 1.00 GHz
9.5 GPU Generation Bifrost 1
14nm Technology 12 nm
3 Max. displays 2
24 Compute units 8
192 Shader 128
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
16 GB Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
12 DirectX Version 11

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode / Encode
Decode Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to 16 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Core m3-7Y30, while the HiSilicon Kirin 710 supports a maximum of 6 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

Intel Core m3-7Y30 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 Memory LPDDR4, LPDDR3
16 GB Max. Memory 6 GB
2 (Dual Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
29.8 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
4.00 MB L3 Cache 1.00 MB
3.0 PCIe version --
10 PCIe lanes --
9.9 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Intel Core m3-7Y30 has a TDP of 4.5 W. The TDP of the HiSilicon Kirin 710 is 5 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Intel Core m3-7Y30 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
4.5 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 5 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
7 W TDP up --
3.75 W TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Core m3-7Y30 has 4.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of HiSilicon Kirin 710 is at 1.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 12 nm.

Intel Core m3-7Y30 Characteristic HiSilicon Kirin 710
14 nm Technology 12 nm
Monolithic Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 ISA extensions --
BGA 1515 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Operating systems Android
Q3/2016 Release date Q3/2018
281 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Core m3-7Y30 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 2.3 stars (3 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the HiSilicon Kirin 710 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.6 stars (8 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Core m3-7Y30 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 (45%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Core m3-7Y30 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 (89%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz
675 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
322 (48%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
1387 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
1384 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz
851 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
348 (41%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
1547 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
1206 (78%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
Intel HD Graphics 615 @ 0.90 GHz
346 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
ARM Mali-G51 MP4 @ 1.00 GHz
166 (48%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz
460 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
645 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
270 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
224605 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 1.00 GHz
0 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
196747 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
2574 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
120 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 1.00 GHz
390 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 2.60 GHz
107 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30
2C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
242 (100%)
HiSilicon Kirin 710 HiSilicon Kirin 710
8C 8T @ 2.20 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Core m3-7Y30 HiSilicon Kirin 710
Unknown Huawei Honor 8X
Huawei P30 lite

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Celeron N3450Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Celeron N3450 vs Intel Core m3-7Y30
2. Intel Core i5-7200UIntel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core i5-7200U vs Intel Core m3-7Y30
3. Intel Core m3-7Y30Intel Core m3-6Y30 Intel Core m3-7Y30 vs Intel Core m3-6Y30
4. Intel Celeron N4100Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Celeron N4100 vs Intel Core m3-7Y30
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GHiSilicon Kirin 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
6. Intel Core i5-7Y54Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core i5-7Y54 vs Intel Core m3-7Y30
7. Intel Core m3-7Y30Intel Atom x7-Z8750 Intel Core m3-7Y30 vs Intel Atom x7-Z8750
8. Intel Pentium N4200Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Core m3-7Y30
9. Intel Atom x5-Z8350Intel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs Intel Core m3-7Y30
10. Intel Core i3-7100UIntel Core m3-7Y30 Intel Core i3-7100U vs Intel Core m3-7Y30


back to index