Intel Core i9-9960X | Samsung Exynos 2200 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Core i9-9960X and the Samsung Exynos 2200 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Intel Core i9-9960X 16 core processor released in Q4/2018 with the Samsung Exynos 2200 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2022. |
||
Intel Core i9 (78) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
Intel Core i 9000X (8) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 2200 (1) |
9 | Generation | 6 |
Skylake X Refresh | Architecture | Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510 |
Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
Intel Core i9-7960X | Predecessor | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
-- | Successor | -- |
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Core i9-9960X is a 16 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.10 GHz (4.50 GHz). The processor can compute 32 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 2200 clocks with 2.80 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
Intel Core i9-9960X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
normal | Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
3.10 GHz (4.50 GHz) | A-Core | 2.80 GHz 1x Cortex-X2 |
-- | B-Core | 2.52 GHz 3x Cortex-A710 |
-- | C-Core | 1.82 GHz 4x Cortex-A510 |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
no iGPU | GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
GPU frequency | 1.30 GHz | |
-- | GPU (Turbo) | 1.30 GHz |
-- | GPU Generation | 1 |
Technology | 4 nm | |
Max. displays | 0 | |
-- | Compute units | 24 |
-- | Shader | 384 |
No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
No | Frame Generation | No |
-- | Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB |
-- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
no iGPU | GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec VP8 | No |
No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
No | Codec AVC | No |
No | Codec VC-1 | No |
No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to 128 GB of memory in a maximum of 4 memory channels is supported by the Intel Core i9-9960X, while the Samsung Exynos 2200 supports a maximum of 12 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s enabled. |
||
Intel Core i9-9960X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
DDR4-2666 | Memory | LPDDR5-6400 |
128 GB | Max. Memory | 12 GB |
4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 4 (Quad Channel) |
85.4 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
No | ECC | No |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
22.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
44 | PCIe lanes | -- |
43.3 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe Intel Core i9-9960X has a TDP of 165 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
Intel Core i9-9960X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
165 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
-- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
-- | TDP up | -- |
-- | TDP down | -- |
92 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Core i9-9960X has 22.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 2200 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 4 nm. |
||
Intel Core i9-9960X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
14 nm | Technology | 4 nm |
Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv9-A (64 bit) |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | -- |
LGA 2066 | Socket | -- |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
Yes | AES-NI | No |
Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
Q4/2018 | Release date | Q1/2022 |
1684 $ | Release price | -- |
show more data | show more data | |
Intel Core i9-9960X
16C 32T @ 4.50 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core i9-9960X
16C 32T @ 4.10 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core i9-9960X
16C 32T @ 4.50 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core i9-9960X
16C 32T @ 4.10 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core i9-9960X
16C 32T @ 4.50 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core i9-9960X
16C 32T @ 4.10 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core i9-9960X
@ 0.00 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 1.30 GHz |
Intel Core i9-9960X
16C 32T @ 3.10 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core i9-9960X
16C 32T @ 3.10 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core i9-9960X
16C 32T @ 4.10 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core i9-9960X
16C 32T @ 4.10 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core i9-9960X
16C 32T @ 4.50 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Intel Core i9-9960X
16C 32T @ 4.10 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz |
Devices using this processor |
|
Intel Core i9-9960X | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
Unknown | Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra |