Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core i5-8500B vs AMD EPYC 9535
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
213 entries
213 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
V-Ray CPU-Render
251 entries
251 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i5-8500B | AMD EPYC 9535 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core i5 (336) | AMD EPYC (147) |
| CPU group | Intel Core i 8000 (20) | AMD EPYC 9005 (29) |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake S | Turin (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) |
| Technology | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Server |
| Socket | BGA 1440 | SP5 |
| Predecessor | AMD EPYC 9534 | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i5-8500B | AMD EPYC 9535 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 64 / 128 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 6x | 64x Zen 5 |
| Frequency: | 3.00 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.10 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.70 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 9.00 MB | 256.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i5-8500B | AMD EPYC 9535 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.35 - 1.15 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 24 / 192 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2017 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i5-8500B | AMD EPYC 9535 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i5-8500B | AMD EPYC 9535 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2666 (42.7 GB/s) | DDR5-6000 (480.0 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | 6144 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 12 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | 5.0 x 128 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i5-8500B | AMD EPYC 9535 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 300 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i5-8500B | AMD EPYC 9535 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| Release date | Q1/2018 | Q4/2024 |
| Release price | 190 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core i5-8500B is 5.0 stars (3 ratings), while AMD EPYC 9535 has received 5.0 stars (3 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Intel Core i5-8500B
6C / 6T · 4.10 GHz
2
AMD EPYC 9535
64C / 128T · 0.00 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
4
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
5
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
6
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
7
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
9
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
Popular Comparisons
