Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core i3-9320 vs Apple A17 Pro
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i3-9320
53 %
4C / 4T · 4.40 GHz
Apple A17 Pro
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.78 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i3-9320
61 %
4C / 4T · 4.00 GHz
Apple A17 Pro
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.78 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Core i3-9320
21 %
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Apple A17 Pro
100 %
Apple A17 Pro (6 GPU Cores)
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
AnTuTu 10 Benchmark
25 entries
25 entries
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
90 entries
90 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9320 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core i3 (205) | Apple A series (27) |
| CPU group | Intel Core i 9000 (34) | Apple A17 Pro (1) |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake S Refresh | Ibiza |
| Technology | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | LGA 1151-2 | |
| Predecessor | Apple A16 Bionic | |
| Successor | Intel Core i3-10320 | Apple A18 Pro |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9320 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x 3.70 - 4.40 GHz |
2x Ibiza P-Core 0.70 - 3.78 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Ibiza E-Core 0.74 - 2.11 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 20.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 8.00 MB | 24.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9320 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Apple A17 Pro (6 GPU Cores) |
| GPU frequency | 0.35 - 1.15 GHz | 0.39 - 1.40 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 24 / 192 | 24 / 768 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB | 6 GB |
| Technology | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2017 | Q3/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9320 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 16 Neural cores @ 35 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9320 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) | LPDDR5-6400 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9320 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62 W | 11 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9320 | Apple A17 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | iOS |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8.6-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q2/2019 | Q3/2023 |
| Release price | 154 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core i3-9320 is 5.0 stars (1 ratings), while Apple A17 Pro has received 4.1 stars (457 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Intel Core i3-9320
4C / 4T · 4.40 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
4
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
9
Apple A17 Pro
6C / 6T · 3.78 GHz
Popular Comparisons
