Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core i3-9100T vs Intel Core i5-3450
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i3-9100T
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Intel Core i5-3450
52 %
4C / 4T · 3.50 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i3-9100T
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
Intel Core i5-3450
57 %
4C / 4T · 3.10 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i3-9100T
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
Intel Core i5-3450
77 %
4C / 4T · 3.50 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i3-9100T
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
Intel Core i5-3450
84 %
4C / 4T · 3.10 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Core i3-9100T
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel Core i5-3450
25 %
Intel HD Graphics 2500
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100T | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core i3 (205) | Intel Core i5 (336) |
| CPU group | Intel Core i 9000 (34) | Intel Core i 3000 (31) |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake S Refresh | Ivy Bridge S |
| Technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 1151-2 | LGA 1155 |
| Predecessor | Intel Core i3-8100T | |
| Successor | Intel Core i3-10100T |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100T | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 3.10 GHz | 3.10 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.70 GHz | 3.50 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.40 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 6.00 MB | 6.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100T | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
| GPU frequency | 0.35 - 1.10 GHz | 0.65 - 1.10 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 24 / 192 | 6 / 48 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2017 | Q2/2012 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100T | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100T | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | 3.0 x 16 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100T | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35 W | 77 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 25 W | |
| T. junction max. | 82 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100T | Intel Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| Release date | Q2/2019 | Q2/2012 |
| Release price | 122 $ | 195 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core i3-9100T is 4.7 stars (21 ratings), while Intel Core i5-3450 has received 3.6 stars (13 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
Intel Core i3-9100T
4C / 4T · 3.70 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
8
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
9
Intel Core i5-3450
4C / 4T · 3.50 GHz
Popular Comparisons
![AMD Ryzen 3 1200 [12nm]](/images/cpu/amd_ryzen_3_2.jpg)
