Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core i3-9100F vs AMD FX-6120
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i3-9100F
100 %
4C / 4T · 4.20 GHz
AMD FX-6120
46 %
6C / 6T · 4.10 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i3-9100F
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.80 GHz
AMD FX-6120
56 %
6C / 6T · 4.10 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
190 entries
190 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
V-Ray CPU-Render
251 entries
251 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100F | AMD FX-6120 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core i3 (205) | AMD FX (30) |
| CPU group | Intel Core i 9000 (34) | AMD FX-6100/6200 (3) |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake S Refresh | Zambezi (Bulldozer) |
| Technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 1151-2 | AM3+ |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor | Intel Core i3-10100F |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100F | AMD FX-6120 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 6x |
| Frequency: | 3.60 GHz | 3.50 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.20 GHz | 4.10 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.80 GHz | 4.10 GHz |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 6.00 MB | 8.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100F | AMD FX-6120 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | ||
| CUs / Shader | / | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | ||
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | ||
| Release date |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100F | AMD FX-6120 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100F | AMD FX-6120 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) | DDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100F | AMD FX-6120 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 95 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-9100F | AMD FX-6120 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX |
| Release date | Q2/2019 | Q2/2012 |
| Release price | 97 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core i3-9100F is 4.2 stars (17 ratings), while AMD FX-6120 has received 5.0 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
AMD FX-6120
6C / 6T · 4.10 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
4
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
9
Intel Core i3-9100F
4C / 4T · 4.20 GHz
Popular Comparisons
