Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core i3-7101TE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i3-7101TE
100 %
2C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.84 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i3-7101TE
84 %
2C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.84 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i3-7101TE
100 %
2C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
8C / 8T · 2.84 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i3-7101TE
75 %
2C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.84 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Core i3-7101TE
47 %
Intel HD Graphics 630
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
100 %
Qualcomm Adreno 640
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-7101TE | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core i3 (205) | Qualcomm Snapdragon (105) |
| CPU group | Intel Core i 7000 (17) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855/860 (3) |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake S | Kryo 485 |
| Technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | LGA 1151 | |
| Predecessor | Intel Core i3-6102E | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-7101TE | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x 3.40 GHz |
1x Kryo 485 Prime 2.84 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 3x Kryo 485 Gold 2.42 GHz |
|
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Kryo 485 Silver 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 1.75 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 3.00 MB | 2.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-7101TE | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics 630 | Qualcomm Adreno 640 |
| GPU frequency | 0.35 - 1.10 GHz | 0.25 - 0.59 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 24 / 192 | 4 / 384 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2016 | Q1/2019 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-7101TE | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Qualcomm AI engine | |
| AI specifications | Hexagon 690 @ 7 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-7101TE | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-7101TE | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 88 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-7101TE | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q1/2017 | Q4/2018 |
| Release price | 117 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core i3-7101TE is 0 stars (0 ratings), while Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 has received 4.3 stars (62 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Core i3-7101TE
2C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
