Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core i3-3225 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i3-3225
50 %
2C / 4T · 3.30 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 7200
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i3-3225
45 %
2C / 4T · 3.30 GHz
MediaTek Dimensity 7200
100 %
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
118 entries
118 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-3225 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core i3 (205) | Mediatek Dimensity (38) |
| CPU group | Intel Core i 3000 (31) | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (1) |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge S | Cortex-A715 / Cortex-A510 |
| Technology | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | LGA 1155 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-3225 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x 3.30 GHz |
2x Cortex-A76 2.80 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 6x Cortex-A55 1.80 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 3.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-3225 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | ARM Mali-G610 MP4 |
| GPU frequency | 0.65 - 1.05 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 16 / 128 | 4 / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 1 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Release date | Q1/2011 | Q2/2021 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-3225 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-3225 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | LPDDR5-6400 (51.2 GB/s) LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-3225 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-3225 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv9-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | |
| Release date | Q3/2012 | Q1/2023 |
| Release price | 134 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core i3-3225 is 2.9 stars (8 ratings), while MediaTek Dimensity 7200 has received 4.1 stars (83 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
6
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7200
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Core i3-3225
2C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
