Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs Intel Atom C2550
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.50 GHz
Intel Atom C2550
74 %
4C / 4T · 2.60 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.50 GHz
Intel Atom C2550
89 %
4C / 4T · 2.60 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Intel Atom C2550 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core2 Quad (19) | Intel Atom (108) |
| CPU group | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000 (16) | Intel Atom C2000 (7) |
| Architecture | Yorkfield (Penryn) | Avoton |
| Technology | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 775 | BGA 1283 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Intel Atom C2550 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 2.50 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.60 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.60 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 6.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Intel Atom C2550 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | ||
| CUs / Shader | / | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | ||
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | ||
| Release date |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Intel Atom C2550 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Intel Atom C2550 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) | DDR3L-1600 (25.6 GB/s) DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Intel Atom C2550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95 W | 14 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Intel Atom C2550 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q1/2008 | Q3/2013 |
| Release price | 74 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 is 3.8 stars (10 ratings), while Intel Atom C2550 has received 5.0 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Intel Atom C2550
4C / 4T · 2.60 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
4
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
9
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
