Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron N2840 vs AMD A4-9120
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Celeron N2840
30 %
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
AMD A4-9120
100 %
AMD Radeon R3 (Stoney Ridge)
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron N2840
79 %
2C / 2T · 2.16 GHz
AMD A4-9120
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.20 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2840 | AMD A4-9120 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | AMD A (112) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 (17) | AMD A4-9000 (2) |
| Architecture | Bay Trail | Stoney Ridge (Excavator) |
| Technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1170 | FP4 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2840 | AMD A4-9120 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 2.16 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.58 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.58 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 2.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2840 | AMD A4-9120 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | AMD Radeon R3 (Stoney Ridge) |
| GPU frequency | 0.31 - 0.79 GHz | 0.66 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 32 | 2 / 128 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2013 | Q2/2016 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2840 | AMD A4-9120 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2840 | AMD A4-9120 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1333 (21.3 GB/s) | DDR4-2133 (17.1 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 4 | 3.0 x 8 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 2.0 GB/s | 7.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2840 | AMD A4-9120 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7.5 W | 15 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 4.5 W | 10 W |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 90 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron N2840 | AMD A4-9120 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 |
| Release date | Q2/2014 | Q2/2017 |
| Release price | 107 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron N2840 is 1.8 stars (37 ratings), while AMD A4-9120 has received 2.2 stars (12 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
AMD A4-9120
2C / 2T · 2.50 GHz
9
Intel Celeron N2840
2C / 2T · 2.58 GHz
Popular Comparisons
