Intel Celeron M 743 vs Samsung Exynos 9610

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Celeron M 743 CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 9610
Intel Celeron M 743 Samsung Exynos 9610

CPU comparison

In this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Celeron M 743 and the Samsung Exynos 9610 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the Intel Celeron M 743 1 core processor released in Q3/2009 with the Samsung Exynos 9610 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q4/2018.
Intel Celeron (165) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
Intel Celeron M 300 (2) CPU group Samsung Exynos 9600 (3)
0 Generation 3
Dothan Architecture Cortex-A73 / Cortex-A53
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Celeron M 743 is a 1 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.30 GHz. The processor can compute 1 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 9610 clocks with 2.30 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel.

Intel Celeron M 743 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
1 Cores 8
1 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
1.30 GHz A-Core 2.30 GHz
4x Cortex-A73
-- B-Core 1.70 GHz
4x Cortex-A53

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Intel Celeron M 743 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP3
GPU frequency 0.85 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation Bifrost 2
Technology 16 nm
Max. displays 1
-- Compute units 3
-- Shader 48
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP3
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode / Encode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the Intel Celeron M 743, while the Samsung Exynos 9610 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled.

Intel Celeron M 743 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
Memory LPDDR4X-1600
Max. Memory
0 Memory channels 0
-- Max. Bandwidth --
No ECC No
1.00 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache --
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The Intel Celeron M 743 has a TDP of 10 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 9610 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

Intel Celeron M 743 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
10 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Celeron M 743 has 1.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 90 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 9610 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 10 nm.

Intel Celeron M 743 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 9610
90 nm Technology 10 nm
Monolithic Chip design Unknown
x86-32 (32 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
MMX, SSE, SSE2 ISA extensions --
BGA 956 Socket --
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q3/2009 Release date Q4/2018
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Celeron M 743 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 9610 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 1.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron M 743 Intel Celeron M 743
1C 1T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
329 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron M 743 Intel Celeron M 743
1C 1T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1164 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Celeron M 743 Intel Celeron M 743
1C 1T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
370 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Celeron M 743 Intel Celeron M 743
1C 1T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
1095 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Celeron M 743 Intel Celeron M 743
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
ARM Mali-G72 MP3 @ 0.85 GHz
94 (100%)

AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Celeron M 743 Intel Celeron M 743
1C 1T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
171465 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron M 743 Intel Celeron M 743
1C 1T @ 1.30 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 9610
8C 8T @ 2.30 GHz
2235 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Celeron M 743 Samsung Exynos 9610
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Samsung Exynos 9610Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
2. Samsung Exynos 9610Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Samsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
4. Samsung Exynos 1380Samsung Exynos 9610 Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 750GSamsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 9610
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Samsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
7. Apple A14 BionicSamsung Exynos 9610 Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9610
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730Samsung Exynos 9610 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
9. Samsung Exynos 9610Apple A13 Bionic Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Apple A13 Bionic
10. Samsung Exynos 9610HiSilicon Kirin 710 Samsung Exynos 9610 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710


back to index