Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron J4025
13 %
2C / 2T · 2.90 GHz
96C / 192T · 5.40 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO (20) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 (11) | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9000 (5) |
| Architecture | Gemini Lake | Shimada Peak (Zen 5) |
| Technology | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 1090 | WRX90 |
| Predecessor | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX | |
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 96 / 192 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 96x Zen 5 |
| Frequency: | 2.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.90 GHz | 5.40 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.90 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 96.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | 384.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.25 - 0.70 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 12 / 96 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2017 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) | DDR5-6400 (380.3 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 2048 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 6 | 5.0 x 128 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 3.0 GB/s | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | 350 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 95 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J4025 | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4A, SSE4.2, SSSE3, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3 |
| Release date | Q4/2019 | Q3/2025 |
| Release price | 11699 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron J4025 is 3.2 stars (19 ratings), while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX has received 3.3 stars (57 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
96C / 192T · 5.40 GHz
9
Intel Celeron J4025
2C / 2T · 2.90 GHz
Popular Comparisons
