Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron J3060 vs Intel Celeron 430
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron J3060
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.48 GHz
Intel Celeron 430
96 %
1C / 1T · 1.80 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron J3060
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.48 GHz
Intel Celeron 430
48 %
1C / 1T · 1.80 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3060 | Intel Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron J3000/N3000 (10) | Intel Celeron 400 (4) |
| Architecture | Braswell | Conroe (Core) |
| Technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 1170 | LGA 775 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3060 | Intel Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 1 / 1 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 1x Core |
| Frequency: | 1.60 GHz | 1.80 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.48 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.48 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 0.50 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3060 | Intel Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics 400 | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.32 - 0.70 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 12 / 96 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q1/2015 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3060 | Intel Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3060 | Intel Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 4 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 2.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3060 | Intel Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | 35 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 90 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron J3060 | Intel Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 |
| Release date | Q1/2016 | Q2/2007 |
| Release price | 107 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron J3060 is 4.0 stars (10 ratings), while Intel Celeron 430 has received 3.0 stars (4 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Celeron J3060
2C / 2T · 2.48 GHz
9
Intel Celeron 430
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
