Intel Celeron J1800 vs Intel Atom D2700
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Celeron J1800 | Intel Atom D2700 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Celeron J1800 or Intel Atom D2700 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Celeron J1800 has 2 cores with 2 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.58 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Celeron J1800 was released in Q4/2013. The Intel Atom D2700 has 2 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.13 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The Intel Atom D2700 was released in Q3/2011. |
||
| Intel Celeron | Family | Intel Atom |
| Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 | CPU group | Intel Atom D2000 |
| 6 | Generation | 1 |
| Bay Trail | Architecture | Cedarview |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron J1800 has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Intel Celeron J1800 is 2.41 GHz (2.58 GHz) while the Intel Atom D2700 has 2 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Atom D2700 is at --. |
||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.41 GHz | Frequency | 2.13 GHz |
| 2.58 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 2.58 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe Intel Celeron J1800 or Intel Atom D2700 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | GPU | Intel GMA 3650 |
| 0.69 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.64 GHz |
| 0.79 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | |
| 7 | GPU Generation | |
| 22 nm | Technology | 65 nm |
| 2 | Max. displays | 2 |
| 4 | Execution units | 4 |
| 32 | Shader | 32 |
| 2 GB | Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB |
| 11.2 | DirectX Version | 10.1 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Celeron J1800 can use up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is --. The Intel Atom D2700 supports up to GB of memory in 1 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --. |
||
| DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM | Memory | DDR3-1066 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 1 (Single Channel) |
| -- | Bandwidth | -- |
| No | ECC | No |
| L2 Cache | ||
| 1.00 MB | L3 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | |
| 4 | PCIe lanes | |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Intel Celeron J1800 is 10 W, while the Intel Atom D2700 has a TDP of 10 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| 10 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 10 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron J1800 is manufactured in 22 nm and has 1.00 MB cache. The Intel Atom D2700 is manufactured in 32 nm and has a 1.00 MB cache. |
||
| 22 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | SSE3 |
| BGA 1170 | Socket | BGA 559 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT | Virtualization | None |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q4/2013 | Release date | Q3/2011 |
| 47 $ | Release price | 50 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 2.41 GHz (2.58 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 4T @ 2.13 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Intel Celeron J1800
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.79 GHz |
||
|
Intel Atom D2700
Intel GMA 3650 @ 0.64 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom D2700
2C 4T @ 2.13 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.41 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom D2700
2C 4T @ 2.13 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom D2700
2C 4T @ 2.13 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom D2700
2C 4T @ 2.13 GHz |
||
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom D2700
2C 4T @ 2.13 GHz |
||
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom D2700
2C 4T @ 2.13 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom D2700
2C 4T @ 2.13 GHz |
||
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Celeron J1800
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom D2700
2C 4T @ 2.13 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Celeron J1800 | Intel Atom D2700 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
