Intel Celeron G3900 | Samsung Exynos 850 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Celeron G3900 and the Samsung Exynos 850 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Intel Celeron G3900 2 core processor released in Q1/2016 with the Samsung Exynos 850 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2020. |
||
Intel Celeron (165) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
Intel Celeron G3000 6. Gen. (6) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 800 (2) |
6 | Generation | 4 |
Skylake S | Architecture | Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 |
Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
-- | Predecessor | -- |
Intel Celeron G4900 | Successor | -- |
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Celeron G3900 is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The Samsung Exynos 850 clocks with 2.00 GHz, has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
Intel Celeron G3900 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 850 |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
normal | Core architecture | normal |
No | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking ? | No |
2.80 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
-- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
-- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
Intel HD Graphics 510 | GPU | ARM Mali-G52 MP1 |
0.35 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz |
0.95 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
9 | GPU Generation | Bifrost 2 |
14 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
3 | Max. displays | 2 |
12 | Compute units | 1 |
96 | Shader | 16 |
No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
No | Frame Generation | No |
32 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
12.0 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
Intel HD Graphics 510 | GPU | ARM Mali-G52 MP1 |
Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
Decode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
Decode | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
No | Codec AV1 | No |
Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
Decode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to 64 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Celeron G3900, while the Samsung Exynos 850 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of -- enabled. |
||
Intel Celeron G3900 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 850 |
DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1600 | Memory | LPDDR4X |
64 GB | Max. Memory | |
2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
34.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
Yes | ECC | No |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
2.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
3.0 | PCIe version | -- |
16 | PCIe lanes | -- |
15.8 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe Intel Celeron G3900 has a TDP of 51 W. The TDP of the Samsung Exynos 850 is --. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
Intel Celeron G3900 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 850 |
51 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
-- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
-- | TDP up | -- |
-- | TDP down | -- |
100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Celeron G3900 has 2.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of Samsung Exynos 850 is at 0.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 8 nm. |
||
Intel Celeron G3900 | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 850 |
14 nm | Technology | 8 nm |
Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | -- |
LGA 1151 | Socket | -- |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
Yes | AES-NI | No |
Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
Q1/2016 | Release date | Q2/2020 |
-- | Release price | -- |
show more data | show more data | |
Intel Celeron G3900
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G3900
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G3900
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G3900
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G3900
Intel HD Graphics 510 @ 0.95 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
ARM Mali-G52 MP1 @ 0.85 GHz |
Intel Celeron G3900
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G3900
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G3900
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G3900
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G3900
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G3900
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G3900
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
Intel Celeron G3900
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
|||
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
Devices using this processor |
|
Intel Celeron G3900 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
Unknown | Unknown |