Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 850 CPU1 vs CPU2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Samsung Exynos 850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

CPU comparison

Samsung Exynos 850 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 ? In this comparison, we check which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Samsung Exynos 850 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 850 was released in Q2/2020.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 (Dual Channel) memory channels. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 was released in Q1/2020.
Samsung Exynos Family Qualcomm Snapdragon
Samsung Exynos 800 CPU group Qualcomm Snapdragon 662/665
4 Generation 7
Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 Architecture Kryo 260
Mobile Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In addition to the number of CPU cores and threads, you can see here whether the Samsung Exynos 850 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 can be overclocked. You will also find the clock frequencies of the processor (single-core and multi-core) here. The number of CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the processor.

8 Cores 8
8 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.00 GHz
8x Cortex-A55
A-Core 2.00 GHz
4x Kryo 260 Gold
--
0x
B-Core 1.80 GHz
4x Kryo 260 Silver
-- C-Core --

Internal Graphics

The Samsung Exynos 850 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. A processor with integrated graphics is also called APU (Accelerated Processing Unit).

ARM Mali-G52 MP1 GPU Qualcomm Adreno 610
0.85 GHz GPU frequency
GPU (Turbo)
Bifrost 2 GPU Generation 6
16 nm Technology 11 nm
2 Max. displays 0
1 Execution units
16 Shader 128
Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
12 DirectX Version 12.1

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 Decode
No Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC Decode
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 Decode
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The memory type as well as the amount of memory can greatly affect the speed of the processor. The memory bandwidth depends on several factors and is given in gigabytes per second.

LPDDR4X Memory LPDDR3-933, LPDDR4X-1866
Max. Memory
0 Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Bandwidth --
No ECC No
L2 Cache
L3 Cache
PCIe version
PCIe lanes

Thermal Management

The Thermal Design Power (TDP for short) specifies the necessary cooling solution to cool the processor sufficiently. The TDP usually only gives a rough idea of the real consumption of a CPU.

-- TDP (PL1) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

Here you will find information on the size of the level 2 and level 3 cache of the Samsung Exynos 850 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 as well as a list of the processors ISA extensions. We have documented the architecture and the manufacturing technology for you as well as the release date.

8 nm Technology 11 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions
N/A Socket N/A
None Virtualization None
No AES-NI No
Android Operating systems Android
Q2/2020 Release date Q1/2020
-- Release price --
show more data show more data



Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Samsung Exynos 850 Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
184 (59%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
312 (100%)
Show all Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core) results



Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Samsung Exynos 850 Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
1026 (78%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
1314 (100%)
Show all Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core) results



iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Samsung Exynos 850 Samsung Exynos 850
ARM Mali-G52 MP1 @ 0.85 GHz
26 (10%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Qualcomm Adreno 610 @ 0.00 GHz
273 (100%)
Show all iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS) results



AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.

Samsung Exynos 850 Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
209877 (100%)
Show all AnTuTu 9 Benchmark results



AnTuTu 8 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.

Samsung Exynos 850 Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
124055 (70%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz
176983 (100%)
Show all AnTuTu 8 Benchmark results



Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Unknown Unknown

Leaderboards

In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.


Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 720GQualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
3. Samsung Exynos 9611Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
4. Samsung Exynos 850Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 460Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
8. Samsung Exynos 850Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 625Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662HiSilicon Kirin 659 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
11. Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4GQualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
12. Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Samsung Exynos 850 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Samsung Exynos 850
13. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GQualcomm Snapdragon 662 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
14. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662HiSilicon Kirin 710 Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
15. Qualcomm Snapdragon 662Apple A12 Bionic Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Apple A12 Bionic


back to index